David Mobley wrote:
All,

I'm looking at the epsilon value in ffoplsaanb.itp (i.e. from CVS of
3.3.1) for opls_400, F-. It's lilsted as 3.01248e00. This is roughly a
factor of 10 larger than many of the other anions (i.e. Cl) and also
roughly a factor of 10 larger than the AMBER96 value (in the same
units) for F-: 2.552e-01.

I assume that this is a typo in the opls file, and the correct value
should be 3.01248e-01?

Thanks,
David
_______________________________________________
gmx-users mailing list    [email protected]
http://www.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/search before posting!
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the www interface or send it to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/mailing_lists/users.php
Hm,

I have changed the sigmas that were wrong before (numbers below 100). F- could be weird though, you can not just compare the epsilon, you have to plot the whole LJ potential if you want to compare. (Yuou can use contrib/sigeps for that).

--
David.
________________________________________________________________________
David van der Spoel, PhD, Assoc. Prof., Molecular Biophysics group,
Dept. of Cell and Molecular Biology, Uppsala University.
Husargatan 3, Box 596,          75124 Uppsala, Sweden
phone:  46 18 471 4205          fax: 46 18 511 755
[EMAIL PROTECTED]       [EMAIL PROTECTED]   http://folding.bmc.uu.se
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
_______________________________________________
gmx-users mailing list    [email protected]
http://www.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/search before posting!
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the www interface or send it to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/mailing_lists/users.php

Reply via email to