Mark Abraham wrote:
Hu Zhongqiao wrote:
 Dear Mark

Thanks for your reply.

In more detail, I used ffg43a1 force field. In the file ffG43a1nb.itp,
one can find the Lennard-Jones parameters for Na+ as follows:

C6=7.2063121e-05; and C12= 2.1025e-08

From these 2 values one can get epsion(Na+)=0.0617 kJ/mol.

Because the force field parameters for ions is relatively simple, the
main interaction of Na+ with other particles is electrostatic and van
der Waal's forces. And I also believe that the combination rule makes
not big difference for different force fields in this case. It is
strange epsion(Na+) = 0.0617 kJ/mol in ffg43a1 is very different from
some references (for example, in the paper shown in my last email, this
value is epsilon(Na+) = 0.42 kJ/mol ).

This is not strange at all. These force fields are probably optimized to achieve different targets under different simulation conditions on a different test set. There is no wonder that they are different, and there's no particular expectation of correlation with any property of real Na+. Ensemble average properties of systems with solvated Na+ should be reasonable, however.

So I just want to know how the
developers of gmx or gromos force field get Lennard-Jones parameters for
Na+.

You should find the original literature that describes them and read it. That's why the authors wrote it :-)

@article{Hermans84,
author = {J. Hermans and H. J. C. Berendsen and W. F. van Gunsteren and
J.
        P. M. Postma},
title = {A consistent Empirical Potential for Water-Protein interactions
},
        journal = {Biopolymers},
        year = {1984},
        volume = {23},
        pages = {1513-1518},
}

@Article{Oostenbrink2004a,
author = {Chris Oostenbrink and Alessandra Villa and Alan E. Mark and
Wilfred F. {Van Gunsteren}},
title = {A Biomolecular Force Field Based on the Free Enthalpy of Hydra
tion and Solvation: The GROMOS Force-Field Parameter Sets 53A5 and 53A6},
  journal =      {J. Comp. Chem.},
  year =         2004,
  volume =       25,
  pages =        {1656-1676}
}

@book{gromos96,
author = {W. F. van Gunsteren and S. R. Billeter and A. A. Eising and P.
 H.
        H{\"u}nenberger and P. Kr{\"u}ger and A. E. Mark and W. R. P. Scott
        and I. G. Tironi},
title = {Biomolecular Simulation: The {GROMOS96} manual and user guide},
        year = {1996},
        address = {Z{\"u}rich, Switzerland},
        publisher = {Hochschuleverlag {AG} an der {ETH} {Z}{\"u}rich}
}

Now please don't think that there will be any information about the ion parameters in any of these papers. If you want to know whether ANY salt force field is ANY good, maybe you should read this instead:

@article{Hess2006c,
        author = {B. Hess and C. Holm and N. van der Vegt},
        title = {Osmotic coefficients of atomistic NaCl (aq) force fields},
        journal = {J. Chem. Phys.},
        year = {2006},
        volume = {124},
        pages = {164509},
optabstract = {Solvated ions are becoming increasingly important for (bio)molecular
        simulations. But there are not much suitable data to validate the
        intermediate-range solution structure that ion-water force fields
        produce. We compare six selected combinations of four biomolecular
Na-Cl force fields and four popular water models by means of effective
        ion-ion potentials. First we derive an effective potential at high
        dilution from simulations of two ions in explicit water. At higher
ionic concentration multibody effects will become important. We propose
        to capture those by employing a concentration dependent dielectric
permittivity. With the so obtained effective potentials we then perform implicit solvent simulations. We demonstrate that our effective potentials accurately reproduce ion-ion coordination numbers and the local structure.
        They allow us furthermore to calculate osmotic coefficients that
        can be directly compared with experimental data. We show that the
osmotic coefficient is a sensitive and accurate measure for the effective
        ion-ion interactions and the intermediate-range structure of the
solution. It is therefore a suitable and useful quantity for validating and parametrizing atomistic ion-water force fields. (c) 2006 American
        Institute of Physics. 0021-9606}
}




--
David van der Spoel, Ph.D.
Molec. Biophys. group, Dept. of Cell & Molec. Biol., Uppsala University.
Box 596, 75124 Uppsala, Sweden. Phone:  +46184714205. Fax: +4618511755.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]       [EMAIL PROTECTED]   http://folding.bmc.uu.se
_______________________________________________
gmx-users mailing list    [email protected]
http://www.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/search before posting!
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the www interface or send it to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/mailing_lists/users.php

Reply via email to