Kazem Jahanbakhsh wrote: > Dear Erik, > >> Remember - compared to the benchmark numbers at www.gromacs.org, your >> bandwidth is 1/4 and the latency 4 times higher, since you have four >> cores sharing a single network connection. >> > > I agree with you about the GbE sharing between 4 cores degardes the > performance. Fortunately, every Cluster node has two GbE ports. I > want to know, can I configure lamd in such a manner that every processor > on every node (with two cores) uses one of these ports for its > communication purposes? And if this is possible, could you please give me > some hints or guidance to start this configuration on the cluster? Hi Kazem,
maybe you want to try OpenMPI instead of LAM. In OpenMPI you can easily use multiple network adapters and you can even make use of different characteristics of different adapters, e.g. if one of both has a lower latency it is be preferred for small messages. Upon run time, you will have to tell OpenMPI something like mpirun -np 16 --mca btl_tcp_if_include eth0,eth1 <mpi-program> > And finally, can you expect any scalability improvements by taking this > approach? In principle, the data throughput can be twice as high compared to a single Ethernet adapter. If you have two identical NICs then latency is unaffected and therefore you will only sense a bandwidth effect, i.e. when your system is big enough. But you could also suffer from additional bottlenecks within the node, so in my opinion the performance you can get from a (4 core+2 NICs) setting will at most be that of a 2*(2 core+1 NIC) setting. Carsten _______________________________________________ gmx-users mailing list [email protected] http://www.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/search before posting! Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the www interface or send it to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/mailing_lists/users.php
