It is found on Gromacs' website
http://www.gromacs.org/content/view/12/176/
Regards,
Yang Ye
----- Original Message ----
From: SeungPyo Hong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: gmx-users@gromacs.org
Sent: Monday, August 13, 2007 9:12:47 PM
Subject: [gmx-users] GROMACS vs. AMBER speed comparison?
Hi, gmx-users,
Recently I have try to use AMBER 9 for the simulation of protein with about 300
residues.
Surprisingly, I found that AMBER is far slower than GROMACS; GROMACS is about
twice faster.
I can not figure out the reason.
Why is GROMACS faster than AMBER?
Could anybody know the reason?
Or have I made a mistake in AMBER or GROMACS simulation?
If anybody has compared the speed of AMBER and GROMACS, please tell me the
result.
Thank you~
--
--------------------------------------------------
'God used beautiful mathematics in creating the world.'
-Paul Dirac
'But he created too many object.'
-Seungpyo Hong
Seungpyo Hong
Master student at PBIL(Protein BioInformatics Lab.) in KAIST, Daejeon Korea
Tel. (82)-18-372-2468
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
_______________________________________________
gmx-users mailing list gmx-users@gromacs.org
http://www.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/search before posting!
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the
www interface or send it to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/mailing_lists/users.php
