Hi Nicholas,

nstlist=1 means you recalculate the neighborlist every single step, which will be quite expensive.

Depending on the type of system and temperature you are simulation you probably want to start somewhere around nstlist=10.

Cheers,

Erik


On Aug 20, 2007, at 10:26 PM, Nicolas Schmidt wrote:

Hello again,

just a quick question:

my simulation runs with vdwtype = cut-off and no charges, so in my understanding I can set rcoulomb to whatever I want, since there is nothing that's got to be calculated.

Within this configuration (rlilst = r_vdw, nstlist = 1) up to 50% of the computation-time is used for ns-pairs, only 30-35% for LJ. Am I doing something wrong here? How can this be done more efficient.

Thanks to everyone

posted the .top and .mdp file along with my output-file


--
Psssst! Schon vom neuen GMX MultiMessenger gehört?
Der kanns mit allen: http://www.gmx.net/de/go/ multimessenger<gmx_ethane_0365_32768.e74269><ethane.itp><ethane_32768. top><md.mdp>_______________________________________________
gmx-users mailing list    [email protected]
http://www.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/search before posting!
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the
www interface or send it to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/mailing_lists/users.php

_______________________________________________
gmx-users mailing list    [email protected]
http://www.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/search before posting!
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the
www interface or send it to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/mailing_lists/users.php

Reply via email to