From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Discussion list for GROMACS users <[email protected]>
To: [email protected]
Subject: [gmx-users] RF-excl confusion....
Date: Wed, 05 Sep 2007 19:19:54 +0200 (MEST)


Dear community,

Thanks for your kind answer, Berk! I am actually trying to understand the
"RF-excl" term, which comes from one of your contributions to version 3.3.:

http://www.gromacs.org/content/view/18/132/

If you will, I have a couple of perhaps naive questions:

1) 2 sentences appear to be in contradiction, to me:

a) The sentence "The 1-4 energies are now reported without reaction-field
correction.", that I cite from the web page above, describing the RF-excl
feature, and

b) "The reaction-field correction should also be applied to all excluded atoms pairs, including self pairs, in which case the normal Coulomb term in eqns. 4.12
and 4.16 is absent.", that I cite from the manual of version 3.3, page 45.

If I understand well, ecluded atom interaction pairs are selfinteracting atoms or 1-4 interacting atoms. These sentences would mean that the reaction field
correction is applied to the former but NOT to the latter?


The reaction-field correction applies to ALL atom pairs that are within the cut-off distance (or more accurately: atom pairs for which their charge group centers
are within the cut-off distance).
So all "normal" non-bonded interaction pairs, as well as all excluded pairs
including self-pairs. The only issue is to which energy term which contribution
is added. In old Gromacs versions the RF correction for 1-4 pairs was added
to the 1-4 energy term. In newer version it is added to the RF-excl term.

2) I don't exactly understand the "self pair" of the sentence I cite in 1 a). To compute a self pair interaction, we would obtain i=j in rij of equations 4.12 and equation 4.16 of the same manual page, making Vcrf and Fi equal to zero. How could one then apply any reaction-field correction, as suggested in the sentence
cited in 1 a)?

3) Is the RF-excl term equal to the reaction field correction "Krf*Rij^2 - Crf"
of eq. 4.13., or to the constant Crf (eq 4.15.)?

The RF correction term is always Krf*Rij^2 - Crf, so for self pairs it is -Crf.

Berk.

_________________________________________________________________
Hotmail en Messenger on the move http://www.msn.nl/services

_______________________________________________
gmx-users mailing list    [email protected]
http://www.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/search before posting!
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the www interface or send it to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/mailing_lists/users.php

Reply via email to