Amadeu wrote:

I used the same trp file for both runs, which was created with 3.3.1. I also tried by creating the trp with the respective grompp version and the same output resulted. There were no errors or warnings when I ran grompp to create the trp file.

OK, in that case please submit a bugzilla. Please upload the tpr file, and include details about your OS, and how gromacs was compiled or downloaded.

        Amadeu

/
/>/ My student and I have been trying the latest Gromacs version (3.3.2) for />/ the simulation of a CNT. We noticed that the bonded energies calculated /
/ with 3.3.2 are quite different compared to those from 3.3.1 (see
/>/ resulting output below). Has anyone observed similar results? Was />/ anything changed in 3.3.2 in how the bonded potentials were calculated? />/ I tried another case for a system with harmonic bond and angle />/ potentials, and the bonded energies were identical for both versions, />/ which makes me believe that the Morse and G96Angle potentials are
/>/ somehow different in 3.3.2. Could this be a bug?
/>/ />/ --Amadeu />/ />/ />/ Initial set of energy obtained from the same TPR file. Both output were
/>/ obtained with the single precision versions.
/>/ />/ _Output from Gromacs-3.3.2:_
/>/    Energies (kJ/mol)
/>/           Morse       G96Angle    Proper Dih.        LJ (SR)  Disper. corr.

/>/     5.78994e+03    1.44076e+04    5.47403e+02   -1.57601e+02   -2.46982e+01
/>/    Coulomb (SR)      Potential    Kinetic En.   Total Energy    Temperature
/>/     0.00000e+00    2.05627e+04
    3.32197e+01    2.05959e+04    1.11447e+01
/>/  Pressure (bar)
/>/    -3.06280e+02
/>/ />/ />/ _Output from Gromacs-3.3.1:_
/>/    Energies (kJ/mol)

/>/           Morse       G96Angle    Proper Dih.        LJ (SR)  Disper. corr.
/>/     4.38162e+01    4.15264e+01    5.53398e+02   -1.57601e+02   -2.46982e+01
/>/    Coulomb (SR)      Potential    Kinetic En.   Total Energy    Temperature

/>/     0.00000e+00    4.56441e+02    9.54848e+00    4.65990e+02    3.20338e+00
/>/  Pressure (bar)
/>/    -5.04502e+02
/>/ />/ /is this with the same tpr file?

If not, please run
gmxcheck -s1 331.tpr -s2 332.tpr

there might be differences in the topology. Does grompp finish without warnings?



------------------------------------------------------------------------

_______________________________________________
gmx-users mailing list    [email protected]
http://www.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/search before posting!
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the www interface or send it to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/mailing_lists/users.php


--
David van der Spoel, Ph.D.
Molec. Biophys. group, Dept. of Cell & Molec. Biol., Uppsala University.
Box 596, 75124 Uppsala, Sweden. Phone:  +46184714205. Fax: +4618511755.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]       [EMAIL PROTECTED]   http://folding.bmc.uu.se
_______________________________________________
gmx-users mailing list    [email protected]
http://www.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/search before posting!
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the www interface or send it to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/mailing_lists/users.php

Reply via email to