Sorry, I meant the repulsion term

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: RE: [gmx-users] non bonded 
interactionsDate: Sun, 10 Feb 2008 10:03:20 -0500


Hi Xavier,I get your point. Perhaps I should just state what I want to do.I am 
trying to get a no interaction reference state for my main simulation. i.e 
wherein the atoms will behave like ideal gas spheres (excluded volume would not 
be affected). leaving the dispersion term in vdw and turning off all other non 
bonded may accomplished this, I guess this is not possible.> From: [EMAIL 
PROTECTED]> Subject: Re: [gmx-users] non bonded interactions> To: 
[email protected]> Date: Sun, 10 Feb 2008 10:24:35 +0100> > On Fri, 8 Feb 
2008 20:27:35 -0500> Sheyore Omovie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:> > > > I turned 
off all non bonded interaction using the following:> > > > energygrp_excl = SOL 
SOL SOL Protein_A SOL Protein_B Protein_A Protein_B> > > > (where Protein_A and 
Protein_B, are the 2 molecules (peptides) in the box)> > I assume this will not 
affect excluded volume i.e I do not expect to see > >distances less that twice 
the radius of an atom.> > However, after my simulation I get the ff result for 
the distance between 2 > >alpha C atoms in Protein_A and Protein_B (using 
g_dist):> > You have two types of interactions: bonded and non-bonded. 
Removing> all non-bonded interaction means that you only have bonds, angles 
and> dihedrals ... The vdW interactions are part of the non-bonded and they> 
actually define the "vdW" radius of the atoms through the LJ potential.> There 
is no explicit consideration of any atomic radius besides this> in classic 
force field with explicit solvent.> > It seem to me strange tho expect the 
distances to have any relation> with the radius if you remove them!> > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > 0.182811> > > > 0.221014> > > > 0.240868> > > > 0.279282> > > > 
0.322291> > > > 0.334325> > > > 0.356991> > > > 0.357273> > > > 0.401965> > 
....> > The diameter of a C atom is about .3nm so I was surprised to see 
distances > >less than that.> > I'll appreciate any help.> > > > Regards> > 
John> > > > > > > > 
_________________________________________________________________> > Need to 
know the score, the latest news, or you need your HotmailĀ®-get your > >"fix".> 
> http://www.msnmobilefix.com/Default.aspx> > 
-----------------------------------------------------> XAvier Periole - PhD> > 
NMR & Molecular Dynamics Group> University of Groningen> The Netherlands> 
http://md.chem.rug.nl/~periole> 
-----------------------------------------------------> 
_______________________________________________> gmx-users mailing list 
[email protected]> http://www.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users> 
Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/search before posting!> 
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the > www interface 
or send it to [EMAIL PROTECTED]> Can't post? Read 
http://www.gromacs.org/mailing_lists/users.php

Climb to the top of the charts! Play the word scramble challenge with star 
power. Play now! 
_________________________________________________________________
Need to know the score, the latest news, or you need your HotmailĀ®-get your 
"fix".
http://www.msnmobilefix.com/Default.aspx
_______________________________________________
gmx-users mailing list    [email protected]
http://www.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/search before posting!
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the 
www interface or send it to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/mailing_lists/users.php

Reply via email to