Hi everyone

I am having some difficulty using 'vsite aromatics' for tyrosine residues. I've made a pdb of a sole tyrosine residue and run it through:

pdb2gmx -f tyr.pdb -o tyr.gro -vsite aromatics -heavyh

using gromacs 3.3 and ffG43a2

Subsequently I put it into a box (editconf) and try to run an EM at which point it explodes. ("This usually indicates your system is exploding." msg in EM) When I run the same procedure with -vsite hydrogens, the problem disappears.

I'm a bit confused because the gromacs 3.3 manual (e.g. Figure 6.4) shows which dummy atoms should be generated and indicates that HH should NOT be a virtual site. However, when I look in my topol.top file, the HH atom is treated as a virtual site with no mass. In addition, the program creates a virtual atom (MW1) in line with the OH-HH vector, 2 A from the HH atom. As far as I can tell from the manual that virtual site should not be there (?).

[ atoms ]
; nr type resnr residue atom cgnr charge mass typeB chargeB massB 1 MNH3 1 TYR MN1 1 0 8.51535 ; qtot 0 2 MNH3 1 TYR MN2 1 0 8.51535 ; qtot 0 3 NL 1 TYR N 1 0.129 0 ; qtot 0.129 4 H 1 TYR H1 1 0.248 0 ; qtot 0.377 5 H 1 TYR H2 1 0.248 0 ; qtot 0.625 6 H 1 TYR H3 1 0.248 0 ; qtot 0.873 7 CH1 1 TYR CA 1 0.127 13.019 ; qtot 1 8 CH2 1 TYR CB 2 0 14.027 ; qtot 1 9 C 1 TYR CG 2 0 25.366 ; qtot 1 10 C 1 TYR CD1 3 -0.1 0 ; qtot 0.9 11 HC 1 TYR HD1 3 0.1 0 ; qtot 1 12 C 1 TYR CD2 4 -0.1 0 ; qtot 0.9 13 HC 1 TYR HD2 4 0.1 0 ; qtot 1 14 C 1 TYR CE1 5 -0.1 25.366 ; qtot 0.9 15 HC 1 TYR HE1 5 0.1 0 ; qtot 1 16 C 1 TYR CE2 6 -0.1 25.366 ; qtot 0.9 17 HC 1 TYR HE2 6 0.1 0 ; qtot 1 18 C 1 TYR CZ 7 0.15 0 ; qtot 1.15 19 OA 1 TYR OH 7 -0.548 16.5034 ; qtot 0.602 20 MW 1 TYR MW1 7 0 0.504 ; qtot 0.602 21 H 1 TYR HH 8 0.398 0 ; qtot 1 22 C 1 TYR C 9 0.27 12.011 ; qtot 1.27 23 OM 1 TYR O1 9 -0.635 15.9994 ; qtot 0.635 24 OM 1 TYR O2 9 -0.635 15.9994 ; qtot 0

I searched the mailing list and was only able to find this thread that seems to be related, but not quite the same: http://www.gromacs.org/pipermail/gmx-developers/2002-June/000239.html

This seems odd to me as this should have created problems earlier, no? Or am I missing something obvious?!

Thanks a lot for any suggestions!

David

_______________________________________________
gmx-users mailing list    [email protected]
http://www.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/search before posting!
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the www interface or send it to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/mailing_lists/users.php

Reply via email to