> > >> There is no non-bonded interaction between these two oxygens, unless you >> are using an Urey-Bradley potential for the angle, like in the CHARMM force >> field. Most (if not all) of the standard force fields in Gromacs treat the >> interaction of these oxygens within an angle definition, which is a bonded >> term. >> >> -Justin > > So no coloumb law between the two oxygens? 10x, Omer.
_______________________________________________ gmx-users mailing list [email protected] http://www.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/search before posting! Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the www interface or send it to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/mailing_lists/users.php
