Berk Hess wrote:
> Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2009 16:49:33 +0100
> From: [email protected]
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: RE: [gmx-users] Physical problems of comm removal
>
> Thanks for your ideas!
>
> I will discuss the possible solutions with my supervisor.
>
> To your PS:
> This is a good hint, I changed many optimization flags to get a good
> scaling but never changed the axis. I created the box with editconf
> -princ. It automatically made z the longest axis and x the shortest.
> Since many users use PME, it might be a good idea to change the behavior
> of editconf -princ.
>
Ah, I didn't know this.
I changed the order of -princ for 4.0.4.
Could the -princ option be made interactive, such that the user could choose the
axis? I use -princ to orient the long axis of my membrane proteins along the
z-axis, since the bilayer is in the x-y plane. I suppose a bit of rotation
could fix this, but allowing the user to choose would be pretty convenient.
-Justin
Berk
> Again: Thank you very much for your help!
> Christian.
>
> On Thu, 2009-02-12 at 16:28 +0100, Berk Hess wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Another crude solution is to divide your protein into two groups along
> > the long axis
> > and use the pull code to keep the two components perpendicular to the
> > axis
> > of the vector between the COMs at zero.
> >
> > PS: if you have PME your system will run faster when you make x the
> > long axis.
> >
> > Berk
> >
> > > Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2009 16:21:29 +0100
> > > From: [email protected]
> > > To: [email protected]
> > > Subject: RE: [gmx-users] Physical problems of comm removal
> > >
> > > Hi Berk,
> > >
> > > the rhombic dodecahedron with 1771 nm^3 is still twice as big as my
> > > stretched box.
> > >
> > > This System scales quite well till 256 CPUs and I normally use this
> > > amount of CPUs (I have to hurry up with my PhD thesis), so particle
> > > decomposition is not an alternative.
> > >
> > > Are there other alternatives?
> > >
> > > Thanks so far!
> > > Christian
> > >
> > > On Thu, 2009-02-12 at 16:09 +0100, Berk Hess wrote:
> > > > Hi,
> > > >
> > > > The cleanest solution is using a rhombic dodecahedron:
> > > > volume 13.58^3/sqrt(2) = 1771 nm^3
> > > > (I don't know why people still consider truncated octahedrons).
> > > >
> > > > You can try using comm-mode=angular with as comm group only the
> > > > protein.
> > > > This should not produce significant artifacts when your protein is
> > > > large.
> > > > However, this will not run with domain decomposition,
> > > > only with particle decomposition (mdrun -pd), which scales worse,
> > > > but probably not so bad with 4-8 cores.
> > > >
> > > > Berk
> > > >
> > > > > Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2009 16:00:30 +0100
> > > > > From: [email protected]
> > > > > To: [email protected]
> > > > > Subject: [gmx-users] Physical problems of comm removal
> > > > >
> > > > > Hi users!
> > > > >
> > > > > I simulate a stretched protein in TIP4P water in a cubic box
> > > > > (6.83x9.60x13.58=890) with pbc. During a 50 ns simulation, my
> > > > protein
> > > > > must not rotate (otherwise, it will interact with itself). I
> > found
> > > > three
> > > > > possibilities to avoid a self interaction: (1) a bigger box, (2)
> > > > > restraints or (3) comm removal.
> > > > >
> > > > > In details:
> > > > > (1) bigger box:
> > > > > I need at least a diameter of 13.58 nm in every direction to
> > avoid a
> > > > > self interaction (because of a possible rotation of the
> > protein).
> > > > For a
> > > > > cubic box, this would be (13.58^3 =) 2504 nm^3. For a truncated
> > > > > octahedron still 1928 nm^3, which would still be twice the box
> > size
> > > > I
> > > > > use now. This is not suitable for me.
> > > > >
> > > > > (2) restraints:
> > > > > These are "long-time" runs, where I want to observe domain
> > movement,
> > > > so
> > > > > restraints are not an alternative for my simulation.
> > > > >
> > > > > (3) comm removal:
> > > > > To use my stretched box, I have to use COMM-MODE = Angular. This
> > > > mode
> > > > > provokes artifacts, if I use it only on my protein and is
> > therefore
> > > > > forbidden since GMX4.0.3. But what happens, if I use it for my
> > whole
> > > > > system? My protein has a mass of 142800 a.m.u. and the solvent
> > has a
> > > > > mass of 998100 a.m.u. Let us assume, that the solvent movement
> > > > reduces
> > > > > itself, because its movement is undirected and the mass of the
> > > > protein
> > > > > is high enough to fall into account (which might not be true
> > > > because:
> > > > >
> > > > > v_{comm_removal}= 1 / (m_{solvent} + m_{protein}) \cdot
> > > > > \sum_{i(solvent)}^n{(solvent)} ( m_i \cdot v_i) \cdot
> > > > > \sum_{j(protein)}^o{(protein)} ( m_j \cdot v_j)
> > > > >
> > > > > with \sum v_i=0 (because the movement of the solvent is
> > undirected)
> > > > the
> > > > > equation would be:
> > > > >
> > > > > v_{comm_removal}= 1 / (m_{solvent} + m_{protein}) \cdot
> > > > > \sum_{j(protein)}^o{(protein)} ( m_j \cdot v_j)
> > > > >
> > > > > which weights the movement of the protein with its mass, put
> > divides
> > > > it
> > > > > by the mass of protein+mass, what may result in a to small
> > removal
> > > > of
> > > > > the comm.)
> > > > >
> > > > > Beside this problem, do I have to expect that there might be
> > other
> > > > > problems with COMM-MODE = Angular, COMM-GRPS = System and a
> > cubic
> > > > box
> > > > > with pbc?
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > --
> > > > > M. Sc. Christian Seifert
> > > > > Department of Biophysics
> > > > > University of Bochum
> > > > > ND 04/67
> > > > > 44780 Bochum
> > > > > Germany
> > > > > Tel: +49 (0)234 32 28363
> > > > > Fax: +49 (0)234 32 14626
> > > > > E-Mail: [email protected]
> > > > > Web: http://www.bph.rub.de
> > > > >
> > > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > > gmx-users mailing list [email protected]
> > > > > http://www.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
> > > > > Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/search
> > before
> > > > posting!
> > > > > Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the
> > > > > www interface or send it to [email protected].
> > > > > Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/mailing_lists/users.php
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > ______________________________________________________________________
> > > > Express yourself instantly with MSN Messenger! MSN Messenger
> > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > gmx-users mailing list [email protected]
> > > > http://www.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
> > > > Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/search before
> > posting!
> > > > Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the
> > > > www interface or send it to [email protected].
> > > > Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/mailing_lists/users.php
> > > --
> > > M. Sc. Christian Seifert
> > > Department of Biophysics
> > > University of Bochum
> > > ND 04/67
> > > 44780 Bochum
> > > Germany
> > > Tel: +49 (0)234 32 28363
> > > Fax: +49 (0)234 32 14626
> > > E-Mail: [email protected]
> > > Web: http://www.bph.rub.de
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > gmx-users mailing list [email protected]
> > > http://www.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
> > > Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/search before
> > posting!
> > > Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the
> > > www interface or send it to [email protected].
> > > Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/mailing_lists/users.php
> >
> >
> > ______________________________________________________________________
> > Express yourself instantly with MSN Messenger! MSN Messenger
> > _______________________________________________
> > gmx-users mailing list [email protected]
> > http://www.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
> > Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/search before
posting!
> > Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the
> > www interface or send it to [email protected].
> > Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/mailing_lists/users.php
> --
> M. Sc. Christian Seifert
> Department of Biophysics
> University of Bochum
> ND 04/67
> 44780 Bochum
> Germany
> Tel: +49 (0)234 32 28363
> Fax: +49 (0)234 32 14626
> E-Mail: [email protected]
> Web: http://www.bph.rub.de
>
> _______________________________________________
> gmx-users mailing list [email protected]
> http://www.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
> Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/search before
posting!
> Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the
> www interface or send it to [email protected].
> Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/mailing_lists/users.php
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Express yourself instantly with MSN Messenger! MSN Messenger
<http://clk.atdmt.com/AVE/go/onm00200471ave/direct/01/>
------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
gmx-users mailing list [email protected]
http://www.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/search before posting!
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the
www interface or send it to [email protected].
Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/mailing_lists/users.php
--
========================================
Justin A. Lemkul
Graduate Research Assistant
Department of Biochemistry
Virginia Tech
Blacksburg, VA
jalemkul[at]vt.edu | (540) 231-9080
http://www.bevanlab.biochem.vt.edu/Pages/Personal/justin
========================================
_______________________________________________
gmx-users mailing list [email protected]
http://www.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/search before posting!
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the
www interface or send it to [email protected].
Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/mailing_lists/users.php
