Tree wrote:
Dear All:


I appreciate your answer always.

Right now, I am trying to add/modify some values in OPLS-aa FF.
I am confused atom type (opls_xxx) and atom name (e.g., C) in "atp", "bon.itp", and "nb.itp" files.

Please let me try the situation by an example, first.
In "atp" file,
  ...
  opls_058   12.01100  ; C  in COOR ester JPC3315(91)
  opls_059   15.99940  ; O= in COOR ester
  ...

In "bon.itp" file,
  ...
  C     CA      1    0.14900   334720.0   ; wlj 8/97
  C_2   CA      1    0.14900   334720.0   ; wlj 8/97
  ...

In "nb.itp" file,
  ...
opls_009 C2 7 14.02700 0.000 A 3.90500e-01 4.93712e-01 ; SIG opls_010 C3 6 15.03500 0.000 A 3.90500e-01 7.32200e-01 ; SIG
  ...

I hope you can sense what my question is here.
When I define a residue in "rtp" file, I give some name for my atom in my system and assignment between that specific atom name and opls_xxx. Then, gromacs (pdb2gmx) is using "rtp" file to assign each atom to the opls_xxx. "nb.itp" also has opls_xxx information inside, so I can understand how those values are assigned. However, I am not clear how the procedue assign bonded potentials to the system, because "bon.itp" file does not have any information related to the opls_xxx.

It does, but only indirectly.  Example, from ffoplsaa.rtp:

[ ACE ]
 [ atoms ]
   CH3    opls_135   -0.180     1
  HH31    opls_140    0.060     1

From ffoplsaanb.itp:

 opls_135   CT  6     12.01100    -0.180       A    3.50000e-01  2.76144e-01
...
 opls_140   HC  1      1.00800     0.060       A    2.50000e-01  1.25520e-01

So the more literal interpretation of opls_135 is atom type CT, and opls_140 is HC. I assume this is done for convenience.

Therefore, in ffoplsaabon.itp:

  CT    HC      1    0.10900   284512.0   ; CHARMM 22 parameter file

Also, my question related to the above sentece is whether the bonded potentials are assigned according to the name of atom, which I defined in my "pdb" file. (I doubt this... If this question is true, it can't be used for general cases.)

Nothing is typically done based on atom names; atom types are much more important when considering bonded and non-bonded potentials.

This is subsequently how I can add new values in the "bon.itp" file by assigning the name in an appropriate way... I think I am relatively clear in assigning between opls_xxx and name in "nb.itp" file.

To summarize my question, how the assignment between opls_xxx and name in the "bon.itp" can be defined-?


Translate the opls_XXX atom types to a more "literal" type given in 
ffoplsaanb.itp.

-Justin


I hope my question and Englsh are clear enough...

Thank you again!


Sincerely,

Kim


------------------------------------------------------------------------

_______________________________________________
gmx-users mailing list    [email protected]
http://www.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/search before posting!
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the www interface or send it to [email protected].
Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/mailing_lists/users.php

--
========================================

Justin A. Lemkul
Graduate Research Assistant
ICTAS Doctoral Scholar
Department of Biochemistry
Virginia Tech
Blacksburg, VA
jalemkul[at]vt.edu | (540) 231-9080
http://www.bevanlab.biochem.vt.edu/Pages/Personal/justin

========================================
_______________________________________________
gmx-users mailing list    [email protected]
http://www.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/search before posting!
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the www interface or send it to [email protected].
Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/mailing_lists/users.php

Reply via email to