Hi
We have tried with no cutoff, as I have written in former emails, but
that was when we got trouble with LINCS warnings. We then thought that
we could try to continue remove lipids in the compression-steps to get
rid of that LINCS warnings, and to have a stable system!
Is it maybe the protein that is the problem - need to be more minimized?
/Edvin
Justin A. Lemkul wrote:
Justin A. Lemkul wrote:
Edvin Erdtman wrote:
Hi again
I don't know if you were aware of it, but I have commented some
Justin's questions further down in the e-mail (my last e-mail wasn't
only a thank-email). Since it took so long, and other similar
discussions are still running I thought you have missed my comments
(see below).
Now we have tried with a Calpha-P cutoff of 5 Å (i.e. perl
inflategro.pl em1/confout.gro 0.97 DPPC 5 em2/input.gro 5
em2/area.dat), and position restraints on the protein, I have also
merged Cl and SOL in the same temp group, but it does not seem to
work anyway. We still get the LINCS warnings.
Why are you using a cutoff during the compression phase? You will
continue to delete lipids! I have never had a problem if I scale up
by a factor of 4, with a 1.4-nm cutoff, then compress by a factor of
0.95 (with no cutoff).
Maybe that will make a difference?
-Justin
begin:vcard
fn:Edvin Erdtman
n:Erdtman;Edvin
org;quoted-printable:=C3=96rebro University;Biophysical Chemistry, School of Science and Technology
adr;quoted-printable:;;;=C3=96rebro;;701 82 ;Sweden
email;internet:[email protected]
title:Fil. Lic.
tel;work:019-30 13 81
tel;fax:019-30 35 66
x-mozilla-html:TRUE
url:http://www.oru.se/nat/Edvin_Erdtman
version:2.1
end:vcard
_______________________________________________
gmx-users mailing list [email protected]
http://www.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/search before posting!
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the
www interface or send it to [email protected].
Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/mailing_lists/users.php
