Yanmei Song wrote:
Dear Justin:
Thanks for your response. I saw this in the ffoplsaabon.itp, which I
think is a Periodic potential.
So check out table 5.4 in the manual and find out for sure!
[ dihedraltypes ]
; i j k l func coefficients
; Added DvdS for Quartz simulations
SI OS 1 0.000 3.766 3
SI OH 1 0.000 3.766 3
Does this mean that we can still use a periodic potential combined with
OPLS force field since it seems OPLS also consists of the periodic
potential besides RB. It doesn't have to be necessary to use RB for the
proper dihedral when you use OPLS force field, right?
What's necessary is to use parameters and functional forms that have
been demonstrated to be parameterized for your observables. Mixing
functional forms doesn't seem like something to encourage, but if it's
been done already and you're happy with their results, then go for it.
Mark
_______________________________________________
gmx-users mailing list [email protected]
http://www.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/search before posting!
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the
www interface or send it to [email protected].
Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/mailing_lists/users.php
