Hi,
It is plain 10-4.
The difference is probably due to the coefficients.
With 10-4 mdrun integrates with a uniform atom density on the wall plane.
The tables simply use the table times the C12 and C6 parameters
without any other factor.
Berk
> Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2009 17:34:10 -0700
> From: [email protected]
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: [gmx-users] Form of 10-4 Wall Potential Function.
>
> Could someone clarify the form of the 10-4 potential function used in
> GROMACS walls? Is it really 10-4, and not 10-4-3?
>
> We have tried to create our own 10-4 potential using tables but it doesn't
> match the results of the built-in GROMACS wall type.
>
> _______________________________________________
> gmx-users mailing list [email protected]
> http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
> Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/search before posting!
> Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the
> www interface or send it to [email protected].
> Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/mailing_lists/users.php
_________________________________________________________________
Express yourself instantly with MSN Messenger! Download today it's FREE!
http://messenger.msn.click-url.com/go/onm00200471ave/direct/01/
_______________________________________________
gmx-users mailing list [email protected]
http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/search before posting!
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the
www interface or send it to [email protected].
Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/mailing_lists/users.php
