So sorry! You're absolutely right. Re the question on Zn 2+ I am asking about
the ffgmx forcefield.
Marc Charendoff wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I am curious - is there anyway to see what assumptions were made when
>parameterizing the Zn 2+ ion? Was it tetrahedrally or octahedrally
>coordinated? With waters only or with imidazoles? Do the different force
>fields make different assumptions? Guidance appreciated.
Without even knowing the force field to which you were referring, we
can't say anything other than to refer you to the primary literature for
that force field.
Mark
_______________________________________________
gmx-users mailing list [email protected]
http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/search before posting!
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the
www interface or send it to [email protected].
Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/mailing_lists/users.php
