David,

I get a different simulation result if I use isotropic or anisotropic cells.
I am not sure yet which is (more) correct, but I would like to be able to
run both types to see.  I understand that a constrained anisotropic cell is
not completely anisotropic, but a fully anistropic one clearly doesn't work.

David


>> Dear All,
>> 
>> We are running some simulations using an anisotropic periodic cell.  We are
>> getting 'cell runaway' with the cell becoming very long and thin.  This
>> appears to being driven by the electrostatics of the system.  The simulation
>> then dies because the smallest cell dimension is less than 2*cutoff.
>> 
>> Is there a way that we can apply some constraints to the periodic cell?
> Why not use isotropic pressure coupling?
> 
>> 
>> Regards
>> 
>> David

________________________________________________________________________

David Chalmers                                      Lab: 9903 9110
Faculty of Pharmacy, Monash University
381 Royal Pde, Parkville, Vic 3053. Australia
[email protected]
________________________________________________________________________


-- 
gmx-users mailing list    [email protected]
http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/search before posting!
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the 
www interface or send it to [email protected].
Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/mailing_lists/users.php

Reply via email to