Vitaly V. Chaban wrote:
On Thu, Mar 25, 2010 at 12:45 AM, XAvier Periole <[email protected]> wrote:
On Mar 24, 2010, at 10:58 PM, Vitaly V. Chaban wrote:

Hi,

I want to test different values of cutoff for vdw. However, in the list
someone said cutoff = 0.9 for vdw was used for paramaterizing of >Gromos
force field, other values would cause error, and also there was someone
saying that cutoff for vdw should be set to 1.4. Can >someone make this
question clear? Thanks a lot.
The common rule for all FFs is to set the LJ-cutoff around
2.5*sigma(LJ12-6). In fact, you'll get about 0.9 nm for the most
objects. I see nothing terrible if you use, say, 1.4 nm just because
the difference will be negligible.
Where is that coming from? This is so wrong!

From the properties of LJ12-6 curve.
attr
Just test it. :)
I've you ever tried that on a lipid bilayer?

My interests are a bit shifted from bilayers. What concrete atom pair
will cause the problem in your example?

Who could ever say (whatever force field) a vdW cutoff of 0.9/1.4 nm
is no difference?

The value of rvdw strongly affects properties of lipid bilayers. It is not true, in this case at least, to say that the differences between rvdw = 0.9 and 1.4 are negligible. Perhaps in aqueous systems, where Coulombic interactions dominate, the effect is minimal, but I can't speak to that directly. With bilayers, from Patra et al. (2003) Biophys. J. 84: 3636-3645:

"Simulations similar to those with rvdw = 1.0 nm have been run with rvdw = 1.4 nm. The average area per lipid using PME is reduced by 0.051 nm^2, whereas the average areas per lipid for three different cutoffs - rcut = 1.8 nm, 2.0 nm, or 2.5 nm - are reduced by 0.017, 0.046, and 0.067 nm^2, respectively. This trend is understandable since an increase in rvdw effectively increases the attractive interaction between the acyl chains, thus reducing the area per molecule."

The balance of attractive and repulsive forces used in the derivation of the force field can indeed be affected by changing these parameters, as is quite clear from the statement above.

-Justin

--
Dr. Vitaly Chaban
--

--
========================================

Justin A. Lemkul
Ph.D. Candidate
ICTAS Doctoral Scholar
MILES-IGERT Trainee
Department of Biochemistry
Virginia Tech
Blacksburg, VA
jalemkul[at]vt.edu | (540) 231-9080
http://www.bevanlab.biochem.vt.edu/Pages/Personal/justin

========================================
--
gmx-users mailing list    [email protected]
http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/search before posting!
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the www interface or send it to [email protected].
Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/mailing_lists/users.php

Reply via email to