Nilesh Dhumal wrote:
Hello Justin
tpbconv -f 3.trr -s 3.tpr -e 3.edr -n glu-emi-cl-128-no.ndx -o
test.tpr
Group 0 ( System) has 2584 elements
Group 1 ( Protein) has 2456 elements
Group 2 ( Protein-H) has 1036 elements
Group 3 ( C-alpha) has 0 elements
Group 4 ( Backbone) has 128 elements
Group 5 ( MainChain) has 129 elements
Group 6 (MainChain+Cb) has 129 elements
Group 7 ( MainChain+H) has 129 elements
Group 8 ( SideChain) has 2327 elements
Group 9 ( SideChain-H) has 907 elements
Group 10 ( Prot-Masses) has 2456 elements
Group 11 ( Non-Protein) has 128 elements
Group 12 ( CL) has 128 elements
Group 13 ( Other) has 128 elements
Group 14 ( GUL) has 24 elements
Group 15 ( O) has 1 elements
--
---
Group 39 ( EMI) has 2432 elements
Group 40 ( C) has 128 elements
---
----
Group 57 ( H18) has 128 elements
Group 58 ( H19) has 128 elements
Group 59 ( CL) has 128 elements
Group 60 ( CL) has 128 elements
I selected Group 0
As I said before, selecting "System" when running tpbconv to get some
subset of atoms is pointless. For now, please abandon the use of
tpbconv altogether. I will repeat: I do not think this is the best
approach for you to use, and is probably just confusing right now.
The output indicates that you have 2584 atoms accounted for in your
original .tpr file. How many atoms are in your trajectory (using
gmxcheck)?
After this I followed the steps given in g_spatial -h.
I selected residue Group 14 and EMI is Group 39 for trjconv.
So, group 14 (glucose) is for centering, and EMI is your output
group? Do you
give these same groups for both #1 and #2 below? What if you output
the entire system? The only time you should need to use your special
index group is for g_spatial itself, as the group to use in the
calculation.
1. trjconv -s test.tpr -f 3.xtc -o b.xtc -center -ur compact -pbc
none -n glu-emi-cl-128-no.ndx
2. trjconv -s test.tpr -f b.xtc -o c.xtc -fit rot+trans -n
glu-emi-cl-128-no.ndx
For 2nd step I got the error
Fatal error: Index[2385] 2410 is larger than the number of atoms in
the trajectory file (2409).
This is a consequence of previously outputting some subset of the
atoms above.
As I want to plot how glucose (GLU:Group 14 )is surrounded by
cation (EMI:Group 39).
Should I select Group 14 in tpbconv ?
No, please discontinue any thought of using tpbconv altogether.
Sorry for so much details and your help is really appreciated.
More detail is better. The more complete the thread is, the more it
helps others and the faster you get a resolution.
-Justin
Thanks
Nilesh
On Wed, May 12, 2010 10:58 am, [email protected] wrote:
Hi Nilesh,
If you need the whole system you maybe don't need to include the
-n
flag in the tpbconv command it will still create your new tpr file
for continuing your work without errors, I had earlier some
similar problem. But as Justin mentioned it is due to some
specification in the mpd as for part of your system was selected
only.. Gigi
-----E-mail d'origine-----
De : Nilesh Dhumal <[email protected]>
A : [email protected]; Discussion list for GROMACS users
<[email protected]>
Envoyé le : Mercredi, 12 Mai 2010 17:47
Sujet : Re: [gmx-users] trjconv : error
Hello Justin,
As you suggest I used tbpconv
tpbconv -f 3.trr -s 3.tpr -e 3.edr -n glu-emi-cl-128-no.ndx -o
test.tpr and I selected group 0 for system group (In system group
all atoms are present.)
Still I am getting the same error.
I have one more question,
I am working on solvation glucose in ionic liquids. As I told you
I
want to show glucose surrounded by cation using iso-surface. After
loading grid.cub file in vmd, all atoms are present. How can I
do sothat I can get only glucose and plot the iso-surface to show
cation position. Can you help me to solve this problem.
Thanks
Nilesh
On Tue, May 11, 2010 5:22 pm, Justin A. Lemkul wrote:
Nilesh Dhumal wrote:
Hello,
I am trying to calculate spatial distribution function (SDF)
for my system.
1. trjconv -s 3.tpr -f 3.trr -o b.xtc -center -ur compact
-pbc
none -n test.ndx 2. rajconv -s 3.tpr -f b.xtc -o c.xtc - fit
rot+trans -n test.ndx
I am getting the following error for step 2.
Fatal error: Index[2385] 2410 is larger than the number of
atoms in the trajectory file (2409).
How can I solve this problem?
Duirng my simulation I didn't specify xtc_grps this option in
md file.
Then it looks like you must have saved only a subset of your
system during step 1 or some other post-processing step. Either
save the whole system, or use tpbconv to generate a .tpr file
that contains only the relevant subset of atoms.
-Justin
Thanks
Nilesh
--
========================================
Justin A. Lemkul
Ph.D. Candidate
ICTAS Doctoral Scholar
MILES-IGERT Trainee
Department of Biochemistry
Virginia Tech
Blacksburg, VA
jalemkul[at]vt.edu | (540) 231-9080
http://www.bevanlab.biochem.vt.edu/Pages/Personal/justin
========================================
--
gmx-users mailing list [email protected]
http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/search
before posting! Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the
list. Use the www interface or send it to
[email protected]. Can't post? Read
http://www.gromacs.org/mailing_lists/users.php
--
gmx-users mailing list [email protected]
http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/search before
posting! Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use
the www interface or send it to [email protected].
Can't
post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/mailing_lists/users.php
--
gmx-users mailing list [email protected]
http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/search before
posting! Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use
the www interface or send it to [email protected].
Can't
post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/mailing_lists/users.php
--
========================================
Justin A. Lemkul
Ph.D. Candidate
ICTAS Doctoral Scholar
MILES-IGERT Trainee
Department of Biochemistry
Virginia Tech
Blacksburg, VA
jalemkul[at]vt.edu | (540) 231-9080
http://www.bevanlab.biochem.vt.edu/Pages/Personal/justin
========================================
--
gmx-users mailing list [email protected]
http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/search before
posting! Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the
www interface or send it to [email protected]. Can't
post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/mailing_lists/users.php