lloyd riggs wrote:
Dear All,

Before I start, I have already searched through the mailing list archives, 
etc...and have energy minimized my structure (s) ;

I get the range check error;
_________________________________________________________________________
Range checking error:
Explanation: During neighborsearching, we assign each particle to a grid
based on its coordinates. If your system contains collisions or parameter
errors that give particles very high velocities you might end up with some
coordinates being +-Infinity or NaN (not-a-number). Obviously, we cannot
put these on a grid, so this is usually where we detect those errors.
Make sure your system is properly energy-minimized and that the potential
energy seems reasonable before trying again.

Variable ci has value -2147483648. It should have been within [ 0 .. 19683 ]
__________________________________________________________________________

does anyone have a fix for this?
I have first energy minimized my structures.  There are two seperate proteins 
with two seperate protein domains (chain a,b each) making up two receptors 
which interact with eachother transiently, or strongly in the presence of a 
molecule.  The two proteins are seperated (manually) by 10 angstroms.

I first energy minimized these, then added waters and ions.  I had problems 
with force fields that recognized all the ions (Mg2+, Ca2+, K+, Na+, Cl-) and 
ended up using the oplsaa force fields.

Now, I try an initial run, MD or a simple 100 step energy minimization, prior 
to a long run, and get the above error again and again.  The two scripts 
mentioned are below inline.  I have however played around with everything I 
could.  I have also started from scratch 3 times, ie the initial 
proteins-minimize-add waters/ions-and then it crashes?

Also, does anyone know what the variable "ci" is?

<snip>

integrator = md dt = 0.005

With a timestep of 5 fs, you should (at minimum) be using constraints, and probably virtual sites as well. Does a more sensible timestep (like 1 or 2 fs) make your system stable?

nsteps = 1000 nstxout = 100000 nstvout = 100000 nstlog = 1000 nstenergy = 1000 nstxtcout = 1000 xtc_grps = system energygrps = system nstlist = 20

You should aim for an nstlist that will update your neighborlist roughly every 10-20 ps, or else (in theory) you could be missing interactions. With your neighborlist updated every 100 ps (!) then your short-range interactions could be changing quite a bit.

coulombtype = PME ns_type = grid rlist = 1.5 rcoulomb = 1.5 rvdw = 1.5 pbc = xyz table-extension = 20

;Temperature coupling tcoupl = berendsen tc-grps = system

Coupling the whole system in one temperature bath may or may not be appropriate. Although not the most likely culprit for your problem, you should be aware. See here, particularly the cited references:

http://www.gromacs.org/Documentation/Terminology/Thermostats

tau_t = 1.0
ref_t = 50.0
; Isotropic pressure coupling is now on
Pcoupl              =  berendsen
Pcoupltype          =  isotropic
tau_p               =  2.01
compressibility     =  4.5e-5
ref_p               =  1.0
refcoord_scaling    =  all

;Velocity generation gen_vel = yes gen_temp = 50.0 gen_seed = 30 ld_seed = 130 comm_mode = angular

In a periodic system, using this comm_mode is inappropriate. Surely grompp warned you about this?

-Justin


--
========================================

Justin A. Lemkul
Ph.D. Candidate
ICTAS Doctoral Scholar
MILES-IGERT Trainee
Department of Biochemistry
Virginia Tech
Blacksburg, VA
jalemkul[at]vt.edu | (540) 231-9080
http://www.bevanlab.biochem.vt.edu/Pages/Personal/justin

========================================
--
gmx-users mailing list    [email protected]
http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/search before posting!
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the www interface or send it to [email protected].
Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/mailing_lists/users.php

Reply via email to