Alexander, please post the following:
1. force constants for your plot at
http://picasaweb.google.ca/117558205101329348732/G_wham#5511287294315721970
NOTE: if they are all 1000 as in your first post, then you have a
problem in your sampling.
2. units for your x-axis in the plot mentioned in part 1, above (i.e.
angstroms or nanometers?)
3. convert one (only one) of your sampling probability histograms to
an energy histogram and debias it (without using wham). To convert to
energy, take each histogram bin and apply E=-kB*T*ln(P). Now debias by
subtracting E_rest=0.5*Fc*(r-r0). You will have noise at each end, but
what about the middle part, is it flat or not? Post a picture of this
please.
Chris
-- original message --
I don't know in advance which of them are redundant; moreover I am
surprised if better scan of configuration space is something weird.
Anyway I removed some windows (see histograms here
http://picasaweb.google.ca/117558205101329348732/G_wham#5511287294315721970)
and now PMF profile is 0.000000e+00 anywhere along z... Any ideas?
Alex
Looks to me like your windows overlap too much - there is complete
redundancy in
many of them, such that it looks like several of your windows are completely
unnecessary. See the example histogram in the PMF tutorial for a more "normal"
histogram.
-Justin
--
gmx-users mailing list [email protected]
http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/search before posting!
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the
www interface or send it to [email protected].
Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/mailing_lists/users.php
