Hi Par,

For a POPC bilayer then both your and my files produce the same tpr's (checked both with gmxcheck and gmxdump). This is pleasing as I not only scripted the conversions but did some parts by hand! I shall check the other lipids to make sure that there are no discrepancies in these.

Also for my files I have included the bonded and non-bonded parameters with parameters from CHARMM27 so as to allow simulations in water and with proteins. I want to re-check these before contributing the forcefield to the website, so it will probably be next week before I upload it. Just to let you know I will use your lipids.rtp as it has the atoms in separate charge groups so as to avoid having to use -nochargegrp with pdb2gmx, whilst mine doesn't. I hope this is fine with you.

Cheers

Tom

Pär Bjelkmar wrote:
Hi Tom,

great do that! If there're no discrepancies and you have tested it we should 
probably put your version among the user contributions. Let me know how it goes!

/Pär

Hi Par,

I have a working version of the CHARMM36 lipids that I converted myself, which I am fairly confident is correct. I shall check your parameters against my ones to confirm everything is the same and report back to the list. I don't see anything which would not work for your script as there are not any major changes to the forcefield in CHARMM36.

--
Dr Thomas Piggot
University of Southampton, UK.
--
gmx-users mailing list    [email protected]
http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search the archive at 
http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Search before posting!
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the
www interface or send it to [email protected].
Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists

Reply via email to