This is the normal behaviour for a MSD vs. time plot. Actually, as set by default in g_msd, neither the first seconds nor the last ones are taking into consideration to calculate the difussion constant.

The explanation for the non-liear curves might be the following. On one hand, at the begining, the behavior is not brownian -- in some places it is refered as "free-flight" or just as difussion at short times (JCP,125,204703 is a good ref) -- On the other hand, as the average is obtained by taking different starting times along the trajectory, there would be much more points to average corresponding to the first seconds of MSD, but for large times, just the few reference times corresponding to the begining of the trajectory will contribute to the average and the these final values turn to be not reliable.

So, the slope at the last 2 ns is not related to any physical event. You should take the linear part corresponding to the middle of the time range. Anyway, check if that region is large enough, if not you might enlarge you simulation time (maybe 40-50ns).

Javier


El 07/10/10 18:36, tekle...@ualberta.ca escribió:
Dear Gromacs,

I have been calculating the self Diffusion constant of my system. Surfactants in a different solvents of the same volume. After simulation for 20ns I found the following data for the trajectory of the mean square displacement.

# D[       TPA] = 0.2039 (+/- 0.0503) (1e-5 cm^2/s)
         0           0
         2   0.0105286
         4   0.0162435
         6   0.0212711
         8    0.026031
        10   0.0307584
        12    0.035134
        14   0.0393323
        16   0.0434628
        18   0.0475354
        20   0.0516609
         -
         -
         -
         -
         -
         -
       920     1.16467
       922     1.16756
       924      1.1703
       926     1.17267
       928     1.17383
       930     1.17483
       932     1.17581
       934     1.17754
       936     1.17957
       938     1.18199
       940      1.1829
       942     1.18596
       944     1.18871
       946     1.19099
       948     1.19219
       950     1.19321
       952     1.19445
       954     1.19613
       956     1.19838

         -
         -
         -
         -
         -
         -
     10576     11.7747
     10578      11.785
     10580     11.7817
     10582     11.7833
     10584     11.7847
     10586      11.784
     10588     11.7855
     10590     11.7904
     10592     11.7926
     10594     11.7943
     10596     11.8036
     10598     11.8141
     10600     11.8112

         -
         -
         -
         -
         -
         -
     19960     36.4106
     19962     36.2607
     19964     39.9243
     19966     39.7493
     19968     39.6744
     19970     39.5838
     19972     39.6723
     19974     39.6374
     19976      39.518
     19978     39.4935
     19980     39.3834
     19982     39.1136
     19984     42.3888
     19986      42.168
     19988     42.1337
     19990     41.9395
     19992     42.0065
     19994     42.0993
     19996     41.8652
     19998     41.8419
     20000     41.9419
     20002     41.6049


From my data, the graph shows a linear trend until 18ns but as soon as it reaches around 19, 20ns it dramatically increases the MSD value. Since the surfactants form aggregation I was expecting the MSD curve to go down. Is any explanation for that. Why? suddenly increases the MSD curve. Which is then the correct slop then!


Thank you

Rob




--
Javier CEREZO BASTIDA
Estudiante de Doctorado
---------------------
Dpto. Química-Física
Universidad de Murcia
30100 MURCIA (España)
Tlf.(+34)868887434

--
gmx-users mailing list    gmx-users@gromacs.org
http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search the archive at 
http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Search before posting!
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the www interface or send it to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.
Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists

Reply via email to