I would look for an error in the input files first.
However, I have a suspicion that this artifact is most likely from a thermostat problem than LINCS. LINCS may be the object that is throwing the exception, but in a recent paper by Rosta et.al., it was shown that weak-coupling thermostats (such as the Berendsen thermostat) that produce noncanonical ensembles (narrowed fluctuation amplitude) undergo significant configuration-space distortion under REMD simulations.

This causes an artificial bias towards exchange of replicas at the high and low end of the temperature scale. In other words, at some point during REMD, LINCS ends up having to deal with a superheated replica showing up at the colder energy levels, forcing it to cope with extremely high differences in velocity.
Switching to a stronger coupling thermostat may be required in these cases.

 <J. Chem. Theory Comput., 2009, 5 (5), pp 1393?1399>

~jared


Quoting [email protected]:

Justin is probably correct, your system is unstable. However, let me mention another possibility. As the temperature increases, the largest stable timestep decreases in length. Is it possible that over some temperature (>1000K?) a 2 fs timestep is no longer viable? In this case, even a well minimized system with a large number for lincs_iter is still going to give you incorrect sampling and possibly crash. You'd need to reduce you highest temperature or reduce your timestep.

I don't know if the gromacs REMD algorithm allows you to use a smaller timestep at higher temperatures, but it's something to look into.

Chris.

-- original message --

For Replica exchange, is there any advantage of in using SHAKE over
LINCS(other than the stepsize)?
 I am running an REM simulation and the simulation stops after running for
variable number of steps (100000, 10000000 etc.) because some bond moves
more than 30 degrees and LINCS gives a warning.


Pooja


--
gmx-users mailing list    [email protected]
http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Search before posting! Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use thewww interface or send it to [email protected].
Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists




--
gmx-users mailing list    [email protected]
http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search the archive at 
http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Search before posting!
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the www interface or send it to [email protected].
Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists

Reply via email to