----- Original Message -----
From: Vitaly Chaban <[email protected]>
Date: Wednesday, November 3, 2010 6:10
Subject: [gmx-users] pressure of the liquid in NPT and NVT
To: [email protected]

> Hi all,
> 
> Please suggest me what is the reason for the below situation.
> 
> The 1728 TIP4P waters system was simulated in NPT under 1bar
> maintained with Parrinello-Rahman barostat at 300K. Some results are
> below:
> 
> Energy                      Average       RMSD     Fluct.      Drift  
> Tot-Drift
> -----------------------------------------------------------------
> --------------
> Total 
> Energy               -58121.6    344.637    344.476   0.182549    36.5101
> Temperature                 299.913    4.11684     4.1138 0.00274337   
> 0.548679
> Pressure 
> (bar)              1.39811    326.506    317.633   -1.30948     -261.9
> Box-
> X                       3.74431 0.00844567 0.00843154 -8.45584e-06
> -0.00169118
> Density 
> (SI)                984.768    6.66431    6.65307  0.0067005    1.34011
> 
> ==========================================================
> 
> The density is stable and the system looks like equilibrated one.
> 
> The output GRO was then renamed to conf.gro and the average Box-
> X from
> the previous run was set as the cubic box side length. 

Unless the box was equilibrated at NPT at the start of the NPT run, or the run 
was very long, the average value over the whole run is not all that likely to 
be one from the equilibrium range. Take the last frame.

> The barostat
> was switched off with no other changes in MDP. The same 
> properties for
> NVT are below:
> 
> Energy                      Average       RMSD     Fluct.      Drift  
> Tot-Drift
> -----------------------------------------------------------------
> --------------
> Total 
> Energy               -58075.8    309.575    308.343  -0.477939   -95.5887
> Temperature                 299.916    4.08901    4.08678 -0.00233712  
> -0.467428
> Pressure 
> (bar)             -18.5469    286.376    285.574    0.37081    74.1628
> 
> 
> So the pressure in NPT is ~1.4 and in NVT is ~(-19). How to 
> explain so
> big difference in average values? Is it possible to get a value of
> around 1 in the NVT?

We had a thread about this last week, and numerous more in the past. These 
observations are strongly dependent on the length of time over which you 
observe the average pressure, and the size of the system. Note that your 
fluctuations dwarf your average... See 
http://www.gromacs.org/Documentation/Terminology/Pressure_Coupling

Mark

-- 
gmx-users mailing list    [email protected]
http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search the archive at 
http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Search before posting!
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the 
www interface or send it to [email protected].
Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists

Reply via email to