On 4/01/2011 9:55 PM, Marcelo Silva wrote:
Thank you Mark,

But in the case of trifluoroethanol:

C(F)   0.5323        1
F       -0.2057        1
F       -0.2057        1
F       -0.2057        1
C(H)   0.1263        2
H(C)   0.0825        2
H(C)   0.0825        2
O       -0.6351        2
H        0.4286        2

The total charge is zero, but if we take the same pattern as for ethanol, the charge group 1, for example, don't add to zero.

OK, so what did the author of these charges have to say about that, and in what manner did they intend to use it? Did their observations justify their parameters?

In the manual it says "When all chemical moieties have a net charge ofzero, these jumps can be reduced by moving groups of atoms with net charge zero, called charge groups, in and out of the neighbor list", that's why I have this question.

There's am unspoken caveat there that this is important when using an electrostatics method that only treats the atoms that are in the neighbour list. With PME, this question becomes moot.

Mark
--
gmx-users mailing list    [email protected]
http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search the archive at 
http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Search before posting!
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the www interface or send it to [email protected].
Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists

Reply via email to