On 12/01/2011 9:37 PM, mohsen ramezanpour wrote:
Dear Dr,Tsjerk
I want to estimate protein-drug binding free energy.
I am using umbrella sampling for this mean.
my drug is inside of a hole in protein. then I have to rotate my system to can fit the pulling line along one box axis. besides I have to pull drug not at direction which connect COM of protein and drug,but it is better to pull it along line which connects drug to
a residue inside of hole.

I would

1) take my starting bound configuration,
2) strip away anything except the protein complex,
3) delete the box information,
4) rotate the complex with editconf until I was happy with its orientation,
5) then generate a suitable box around that orientation,
6) do EM
7) solvate and neutralize
8) do EM
9) etc.

Mark


I rotated box with editconf ,solvated system with genbox,neutralized with genion, now I want to generate NPT and then generating configuration as umbrella sampling tutorial.



On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 1:53 PM, Tsjerk Wassenaar <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:

    Hi Mohsen,

    You're doing something terribly wrong. But why you want to do what you
    attempt eludes me. Maybe it helps if you give an explanation of what
    you want, in stead of what doesn't work. In addition, give the set of
    commands that bring you up to this point, and not only the output of
    mdrun. That way we can probably see where you go astray.

    Cheers,

    Tsjerk


    On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 10:55 AM, mohsen ramezanpour
    <[email protected]
    <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
    >
    > Dear Dr.Tsjerk
    >
    > Before doing md for generating NPT, I did an EM,the result was:
    > poteintial energy:-2.2611160*10^(6)
    > Max F=4.8960352*10^(4) on atom 5289
    > Besides I had done EM before on the same system,I just add
    solvent by genbox
    > and Ions by genion.
    > the above result is for Energy minimization after adding ions by
    genion.
    >
    > I did what you said.but when I was generating NPT equilibration
    > I recieved this massage:
    >
    >
    > Step 0, time 0 (ps)  LINCS WARNING
    > relative constraint deviation after LINCS:
    > rms 8.387059, max 321.381958 (between atoms 5289 and 5290)
    > bonds that rotated more than 30 degrees:
    >  atom 1 atom 2  angle  previous, current, constraint length
    >    5293   5294   74.4    0.1137  12.9330      0.1090
    >    5291   5293   59.1    0.1422  32.1605      0.1390
    >    5291   5292  103.5    0.1096   9.8747      0.1090
    >    5289   5291   89.5    0.1383  39.2022      0.1390
    >    5289   5290   85.7    0.1410  43.8439      0.1360
    >    5289   5287   85.4    0.1426  44.0196      0.1390
    >    5287   5288   90.2    0.1091   1.5178      0.1090
    >    5285   5287   88.7    0.1391   1.9186      0.1390
    >    5285   5286   41.8    0.1092   0.1322      0.1090
    >    5284   5293   87.2    0.1429  21.7425      0.1390
    >    5284   5285   92.4    0.1393   2.0880      0.1390
    >    5277   5278   79.1    0.1532   0.5213      0.1530
    >    5276   5284   63.0    0.1394   1.8946      0.1390
    >    5276   5277   79.2    0.1534   0.7278      0.1530
    >    5276   5275   79.9    0.1432   0.6036      0.1430
    >    5274   5275   82.0    0.1431   0.3189      0.1430
    >    5276   5272   82.1    0.1393   0.6113      0.1390
    >    5272   5273   74.2    0.1333   0.2251      0.1330
    >    5272   5270   77.7    0.1332   0.2428      0.1330
    >    5270   5271   46.5    0.1091   0.1682      0.1090
    >    5268   5270   36.9    0.1391   0.1854      0.1390
    >    5273   5266   41.4    0.1334   0.1933      0.1330
    > Wrote pdb files with previous and current coordinates
    > step 0Warning: 1-4 interaction between 5272 and 5293 at distance
    22.443
    > which is larger than the 1-4 table size 2.400 nm
    > These are ignored for the rest of the simulation
    > This usually means your system is exploding,
    > if not, you should increase table-extension in your mdp file
    > or with user tables increase the table size
    >
    > Please let me know what can I do.
    > thanks in advance
    >
    >
    >
    >
    >
    >
    >
    >
    >
    >
    >
    >
    >
    > On Thu, Jan 6, 2011 at 11:20 PM, Tsjerk Wassenaar
    <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
    >>
    >> Hi Mohsen,
    >>
    >> I think rotating a molecule with editconf will not rotate the
    box. Then
    >> again, if it did, it would result in a box violating Gromacs
    requirements.
    >> Either way, it's not going to work like that. Build a new box after
    >> rotation... And have a good look at what you're actually trying
    now by
    >> taking the rotated system and stack it a few times using
    genconf -nbox 2 2 2
    >>
    >> Cheers,
    >>
    >> Tsjerk
    >>
    >> On Jan 6, 2011 7:22 PM, "mohsen ramezanpour"
    >> <[email protected]
    <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
    >>
    >> Dear Amit
    >> I entered these commands for rotating box:
    >> editconf   -f  conf.gro  -o  output.pdb   -rotate  0   0  25.4
    >> and then:
>> editconf -f output.pdb -o newbox.pdb -rotate 0 127.67548 0
    >> as a result my molecul is located out of box totally,of course
    drug and
    >> protein are bind to eachother yet.
    >> thanks in advance for your attention and reply
    >>
    >> On Tue, Jan 4, 2011 at 1:25 PM, Amit Choubey
    <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: >
    >> > Could you post the e...
    >>
    >> --
    >> gmx-users mailing list [email protected]
    <mailto:[email protected]>
    >> http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
    >> Please search the archive at
    >> http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Search before posting!
    >> Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the
    >> www interface or send it to [email protected]
    <mailto:[email protected]>.
    >> Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists
    >>
    >> --
    >> gmx-users mailing list [email protected]
    <mailto:[email protected]>
    >> http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
    >> Please search the archive at
    >> http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Search before posting!
    >> Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the
    >> www interface or send it to [email protected]
    <mailto:[email protected]>.
    >> Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists
    >
    >
    > --
    > gmx-users mailing list [email protected]
    <mailto:[email protected]>
    > http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
    > Please search the archive at
    > http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Search before posting!
    > Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the
    > www interface or send it to [email protected]
    <mailto:[email protected]>.
    > Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists
    >



    --
    Tsjerk A. Wassenaar, Ph.D.

    post-doctoral researcher
    Molecular Dynamics Group
    * Groningen Institute for Biomolecular Research and Biotechnology
    * Zernike Institute for Advanced Materials
    University of Groningen
    The Netherlands
    --
    gmx-users mailing list [email protected]
    <mailto:[email protected]>
    http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
    Please search the archive at
    http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Search before posting!
    Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the
    www interface or send it to [email protected]
    <mailto:[email protected]>.
    Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists



-- 
gmx-users mailing list    [email protected]
http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search the archive at 
http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Search before posting!
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the 
www interface or send it to [email protected].
Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists

Reply via email to