On January 17, 2011 at 2:47 PM TJ Mustard <[email protected]> wrote:

 

On January 17, 2011 at 2:21 PM "Justin A. Lemkul" <[email protected]> wrote:

>
>
> TJ Mustard wrote:
> >
> >
> > No this is a completely different error that occurs when the other (EM)
> > error does not.
> >
>
> So, EM completes, but you then get this unstable system?  How well did EM
> converge?  Were the potential and maximum force acceptable?
>
> Instabilities are generally caused by incorrect topologies or .mdp settings.
> Those are the first places I would look for sources of error.
>
> -Justin
>
> > 
> >
> > Thank you,
> >
> > TJ Mustard
> >
> > On January 17, 2011 at 1:51 PM "Justin A. Lemkul" <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> >  >
> >  >
> >  > TJ Mustard wrote:
> >  > >
> >  > >
> >  > > Hi all,
> >  > >
> >  > >
> >  > >
> >  > > We have been running a lot of simulations on protein ligand
> >  > > interactions, and my settings/setup/mdp files worked great for one
> >  > > system. Then when we moved to a larger and more complicated system we
> >  > > started getting mdrun 1-4 interaction errors in our MD.
> >  > >
> >  > >
> >  > >
> >  > > We are running with heavyh and have correctly made our ligands with
> >  > > acpype and edited to have heavyh.
> >  > >
> >  > > Same setup as our smaller simpler model, but keep getting these:
> >  > >
> >  > >
> >  > >
> >  > > Warning: 1-4 interaction between X and Y at distance 1.804 which is
> >  > > larger than 1-4 table size 1.800 nm.
> >  > >
> >  > >
> >  > >
> >  > > The jobs will continue on and finish but we are worried about the error
> >  > > that could be included with these errors.
> >  > >
> >  > >
> >  >
> >  > Is this related to the other issue we're discussing?  If so, please
> > do not
> >  > double-post, especially if you're including different information in
> > different
> >  > threads.  It becomes a nightmare to try to keep track of.
> >  >
> >  > That particular error is usually not a good sign.  Normal, stable
> > simulations
> >  > should not give such an error.
> >  >
> >  > -Justin
> >  >

 

Here is the tail of my em:

Step= 3438, Dmax= 2.5e-04 nm, Epot= -1.05878e+06 Fmax= 8.91784e+01, atom= 43563
Step= 3439, Dmax= 3.0e-04 nm, Epot= -1.05878e+06 Fmax= 8.89898e+01, atom= 43563
Step= 3440, Dmax= 3.6e-04 nm, Epot= -1.05878e+06 Fmax= 3.27390e+02, atom= 24
Step= 3441, Dmax= 4.3e-04 nm, Epot= -1.05878e+06 Fmax= 3.34235e+02, atom= 24
Step= 3451, Dmax= 1.0e-06 nm, Epot= -1.05878e+06 Fmax= 3.32604e+02, atom= 24563
Stepsize too small, or no change in energy.
Converged to machine precision,
but not to the requested precision Fmax < 20

Double precision normally gives you higher accuracy.
You might need to increase your constraint accuracy, or turn
off constraints alltogether (set constraints = none in mdp file)

writing lowest energy coordinates.

Steepest Descents converged to machine precision in 3452 steps,
but did not reach the requested Fmax < 20.
Potential Energy  = -1.0587850e+06
Maximum force     =  3.3423511e+02 on atom 24
Norm of force     =  4.9464898e+00

 

My major settings are:

 

define                   = -DPOSRES_WATER

integrator               = steep

nsteps                   = 10000

emtol                    = 20 
emstep                   = 0.01

 

Am I setting my emtol to low? I occasionally see a Fmax of ~250-900 but mostly above that.

 

 

I am currently having the epiphany that -DPOSRES_WATER could be my problem.

 

Thank you,

TJ Mustard

 

OK I ran the EM without the -DPOSRES_WATER defined and continued through my script to pr and md, and I got this error on my first MD after a positional restraint md (we call it a PR).

 

First the EM tail:

 

Step= 5519, Dmax= 8.3e-04 nm, Epot= -1.09261e+06 Fmax= 8.13679e+02, atom= 24
Step= 5520, Dmax= 1.0e-03 nm, Epot= -1.09261e+06 Fmax= 7.21335e+02, atom= 24
Step= 5523, Dmax= 3.0e-04 nm, Epot= -1.09261e+06 Fmax= 2.58642e+02, atom= 24
Step= 5527, Dmax= 4.5e-05 nm, Epot= -1.09261e+06 Fmax= 1.88718e+02, atom= 24936
Step= 5533, Dmax= 1.7e-06 nm, Epot= -1.09261e+06 Fmax= 1.86052e+02, atom= 24
Stepsize too small, or no change in energy.
Converged to machine precision,
but not to the requested precision Fmax < 20

Double precision normally gives you higher accuracy.
You might need to increase your constraint accuracy, or turn
off constraints alltogether (set constraints = none in mdp file)

writing lowest energy coordinates.

Steepest Descents converged to machine precision in 5534 steps,
but did not reach the requested Fmax < 20.
Potential Energy  = -1.0926141e+06
Maximum force     =  1.8871829e+02 on atom 24
Norm of force     =  4.8353853e+00

 

Now the MD tail:

 

No previous checkpoint file present, assuming this is a new run.

Back Off! I just backed up md.log to ./#md.log.1#
Getting Loaded...
Reading file RFP-t_md.tpr, VERSION 4.5.3 (single precision)
Starting 2 threads
Loaded with Money

Making 1D domain decomposition 2 x 1 x 1
starting mdrun 'ligand in water'
25000 steps,    100.0 ps.
step 10400, will finish Mon Jan 17 15:51:43 2011Warning: 1-4 interaction between 108 and 116 at distance 1.800 which is larger than the 1-4 table size 1.800 nm
These are ignored for the rest of the simulation
This usually means your system is exploding,
if not, you should increase table-extension in your mdp file
or with user tables increase the table size
step 11700, will finish Mon Jan 17 15:52:10 2011imb F  0%

 

 

Any thoughts? Remember this system is doing FEP and heavy hydrogens. But so was the positional restraint md, and it did not error.

 

 

Thank you,

TJ Mustard

 

 

 

 

 

> >  > >
> >  > >
> >  > >
> >  > > Any help would be appreciated. Also I can attach my mdp files.
> >  > >
> >  > >
> >  > >
> >  > > Thank you,
> >  > >
> >  > > TJ Mustard
> >  > > Email: [email protected]
> >  > >
> >  >
> >  > --
> >  > ========================================
> >  >
> >  > Justin A. Lemkul
> >  > Ph.D. Candidate
> >  > ICTAS Doctoral Scholar
> >  > MILES-IGERT Trainee
> >  > Department of Biochemistry
> >  > Virginia Tech
> >  > Blacksburg, VA
> >  > jalemkul[at]vt.edu | (540) 231-9080
> >  > http://www.bevanlab.biochem.vt.edu/Pages/Personal/justin
> >  >
> >  > ========================================
> >  > --
> >  > gmx-users mailing list    [email protected]
> >  > http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
> >  > Please search the archive at
> > http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Search before posting!
> >  > Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the
> >  > www interface or send it to [email protected].
> >  > Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists
> >  >
> >
> > 
> >
> > TJ Mustard
> > Email: [email protected]
> >
>
> --
> ========================================
>
> Justin A. Lemkul
> Ph.D. Candidate
> ICTAS Doctoral Scholar
> MILES-IGERT Trainee
> Department of Biochemistry
> Virginia Tech
> Blacksburg, VA
> jalemkul[at]vt.edu | (540) 231-9080
> http://www.bevanlab.biochem.vt.edu/Pages/Personal/justin
>
> ========================================
> --
> gmx-users mailing list    [email protected]
> http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
> Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Search before posting!
> Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the
> www interface or send it to [email protected].
> Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists
>

 

TJ Mustard
Email: [email protected]

 

TJ Mustard
Email: [email protected]

-- 
gmx-users mailing list    [email protected]
http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search the archive at 
http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Search before posting!
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the 
www interface or send it to [email protected].
Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists

Reply via email to