On 10/02/2011 10:54 AM, Rini Gupta wrote:
Dear gmx users,

I am using gromacs (version 4.0.7) first time
to setup a 2-butoxyethanol-water simulation.
I created topology and coordinate file for BE using AUTOMATED TOPOLOGY BUILDER server. It created a topology file (for united atom) compatible with GROMOS ffG53a6 forcefield.
Then a generated a box containing 20 BE and 480 water molecules using
genbox.

When I performed energy minimization followed by mdrun using NPT ensemble.
I get

Potential Energy = -1.56616474544600e+04
Maximum force = 9.72854664927673e+02 on atom 910


Then, I run for 200ps equlibration using NPT ensemble with Berendsen
thermostat and P coupling
I want to use NVT ensemble for my calculations, so it is ok to switch from NPT to NVT ensemble during equilibration?

Sure. See http://www.gromacs.org/Documentation/How-tos/Steps_to_Perform_a_Simulation

First, I did equilibation for 200ps using NPT ensemble
I get
Total Energy Temperature Pressure (bar) Cons. rmsd ()
-1.81617e+04 3.00167e+02 -4.32808e+00 0.00000e+00
and,
My box length changes from 2.7 nm to 2.6503 nm

Then using state.cpt with mdrun I run for another 200ps using NVT settings in .mpd file ( I turn off the P-coupling).

I use the following commands:
I regenerated new .tpr file
grompp_d_mpi -f grompp.mdp -c confout.gro -p topol.top -o topol.tpr

mdrun_d_mpi -s topol.tpr -cpi state.cpt

Simulation is completed with warning

WARNING: The checkpoint state entries do not match the simulation,
see the log file for details

OK and what did you learn from the .log file about this? (Probably, it restarted from the coordinates of the confout.gro, which loses precision and some of the value of your initial equilibration)

and Pressure again increases up to 60 bar

No, it probably doesn't. See http://www.gromacs.org/Documentation/Terminology/Pressure


Total Energy Temperature Pressure (bar) Cons. rmsd ()
-1.82304e+04 2.99992e+02 6.20706e+01 0.00000e+00


I want to know if this is a right procedure for switching ensemble.
do i need to generate new velocities during second run using NVT ensemble?
If this is correct, how can i reach the target of Pressure 1 bar using this approach?

See http://www.gromacs.org/Documentation/How-tos/Extending_Simulations#Version_4

I am using following topology file:
Can anyone please tell me if this topology is o.k to use

It's syntactically correct because grompp doesn't complain. Whether its a sensible model physics can sometimes be rejected off-the-cuff, but can't really be confirmed without actually testing against some other data.

Mark

; Include forcefield parameters
#include "ffG53a6.itp"

[ moleculetype ]
; Name nrexcl
G269 3
[ atoms ]
; nr type resnr resid atom cgnr charge mass total_charge
1 OE 1 G269 O 1 -0.345 15.9994
2 CH2 1 G269 C 1 0.151 14.0270
3 CH2 1 G269 C 1 0.194 14.0270 ; 0.000
4 CH2 1 G269 C 2 0.231 14.0270
5 OA 1 G269 O 2 -0.617 15.9994
6 H 1 G269 H 2 0.386 1.0080 ; 0.000
7 CH2 1 G269 C 3 -0.035 14.0270
8 CH2 1 G269 C 3 0.143 14.0270
9 CH3 1 G269 C 3 -0.108 15.0350 ; -0.000
; total charge of the molecule: 0.000
[ bonds ]
; ai aj funct c0 c1
1 2 2 0.1430 8.1800e+06
1 3 2 0.1430 8.1800e+06
2 4 2 0.1520 5.4300e+06
3 7 2 0.1520 5.4300e+06
4 5 2 0.1430 8.1800e+06
5 6 2 0.1000 2.3200e+07
7 8 2 0.1530 7.1500e+06
8 9 2 0.1530 7.1500e+06
[ pairs ]
; ai aj funct ; all 1-4 pairs but the ones excluded in GROMOS itp
1 5 1
1 8 1
2 6 1
2 7 1
3 4 1
3 9 1
[ angles ]
; ai aj ak funct angle fc
2 1 3 2 109.50 380.00
1 2 4 2 109.50 320.00
1 3 7 2 109.50 320.00
2 4 5 2 111.00 530.00
4 5 6 2 108.53 443.00
3 7 8 2 111.00 530.00
7 8 9 2 111.00 530.00
[ dihedrals ]
; GROMOS improper dihedrals
; ai aj ak al funct angle fc
[ dihedrals ]
; ai aj ak al funct ph0 cp mult
3 1 2 4 1 0.00 1.26 3
2 1 3 7 1 0.00 1.26 3
1 2 4 5 1 0.00 2.53 3
1 3 7 8 1 0.00 3.77 3
2 4 5 6 1 0.00 1.26 3
3 7 8 9 1 0.00 3.77 3
[ exclusions ]
; ai aj funct ; GROMOS 1-4 exclusions




; Include water topology
#include "spce.itp"
[ system ]
; Name
BE in Water

[ molecules ]
; Compound #mols
G269 20
SOL 480

Please help me in this regard.

Thanks and Regards,
Rini

----------------
Dr. Rini Gupta
Postdoctoral Fellow
University of British Columbia
Vancouver



<http://sigads.rediff.com/RealMedia/ads/click_nx.ads/www.rediffmail.com/signatureline.htm@Middle?>


-- 
gmx-users mailing list    [email protected]
http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search the archive at 
http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Search before posting!
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the 
www interface or send it to [email protected].
Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists

Reply via email to