Thank you Mark. I found one message of this month concerning this topic, and there are some small suggestions. I don't think that such a changes can restore a factor of 26, but it could be worth to try to see what happens. I will let you know.

Valeria



On Wed, 23 Feb 2011, Mark Abraham wrote:



On 02/23/11, Valeria Losasso <[email protected]> wrote:

      Dear all,
      I am making some tests to start using replica exchange molecular dynamics 
on my system in water. The setup is ok
      (i.e. one replica alone runs correctly), but I am not able to parallelize 
the REMD. Details follow:

      - the test is on 8 temperatures, so 8 replicas
      - Gromacs version 4.5.3
      - One replica alone, in 30 minutes with 256 processors, makes 52500 
steps. 8 replicas with 256x8 = 2048
      processors, make 300 (!!) steps each = 2400 in total (I arrived to these 
numbers just to see some update of the
      log file: since I am running on a big cluster, I can not use more than 
half an hour for tests with less than 512
      processors)
      - I am using mpirun with options -np 256 -s  md_.tpr -multi 8 -replex 1000


There have been two threads on this topic in the last month or so, please check 
the archives. The implementation of
multi-simulations scales poorly. The scaling of replica-exchange itself is not 
great either. I have a working version under
final development that scales much better. Watch this space.

Mark
-- 
gmx-users mailing list    [email protected]
http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search the archive at 
http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Search before posting!
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the 
www interface or send it to [email protected].
Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists

Reply via email to