My bad, I red to quick and though you had three windows ...
you should follow Justin's advice.

On Mar 31, 2011, at 2:20 PM, Gavin Melaugh wrote:

Thanks Justin for the reply

Gavin

Justin A. Lemkul wrote:


Gavin Melaugh wrote:
Sorry I am not sure that I follow. Will the window with r0 =0.80 giving the distribution centred around 0.78nm not drive my free energy profile up. If I remove this window prior to running g_wham the free energy goes
down. Should I increase the force constant so that the mean of the
window is 0.80nm (bearing in mind that this is near the barrier region).


If you have an incomplete or otherwise discontinuous free energy
profile, then you won't get a correct result, but it's not simply due
to "oversampling" one region. It's that the "oversampling" results in "undersampling" another region. Increasing the force constant for the
window centered around 0.80 nm should work.

-Justin

Gavin
XAvier Periole wrote:
You can present the data differently:
you have two windows at 0.78 nm giving different distribution.

That indicates these windows are not converged. Does not mean
that the others (0.80 nm) are converged :))

On Mar 31, 2011, at 12:20 PM, Gavin Melaugh wrote:

Hi Xavier

Thanks for the reply. With respect to your answer of my first query. What if you had two windows practically on top of each other, but one
was not supposed to be there. e.g A window with r0 of 0.80 nm and
centred at 0.78 nm and a window with r0 of 0.78 nm centred at 0.78nm.

Gavin

XAvier Periole wrote:
On Mar 31, 2011, at 11:53 AM, Gavin Melaugh wrote:

Hi All

I have generated several PMF curves for the one system using
umbrella
sampling. In the first part of the curve (barrier region) I use a
high
force constant with small intervals between the windows. The latter
part
of the curve I use a lower force constant with larger window
spacing.
Anyway I have a few issues that I need clarifying:
1 - Can you have too much overlap between windows?
no, there no such a thing of too much overlap :)) You could even put
two identical windows with same 100% overlap ... no problem.
2 - Does the distribution at each window have to centered around the
desired r0? (If not does this affect the free energy?)
The deviation of the distribution from the r0 is what dictates the profile. The more away from the disired r0 the higher the free energy
of the system.
3- If you over sample one particular window, will it affect the
curve?
There is no such a thing of over sampling ... the only thing you can
have is not enough sampling.
Many thanks

GAvin
--
gmx-users mailing list    gmx-users@gromacs.org
http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search the archive at
http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Search before posting!
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the
www interface or send it to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.
Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists
--
gmx-users mailing list    gmx-users@gromacs.org
http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search the archive at
http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Search before posting!
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the
www interface or send it to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.
Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists



--
gmx-users mailing list    gmx-users@gromacs.org
http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Search before posting!
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the
www interface or send it to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.
Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists

--
gmx-users mailing list    gmx-users@gromacs.org
http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search the archive at 
http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Search before posting!
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the www interface or send it to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.
Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists

Reply via email to