On 10/05/2011 12:24 AM, Dimitar Pachov wrote:


On Mon, May 9, 2011 at 1:39 AM, Mark Abraham <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:

    On 9/05/2011 2:01 PM, Dimitar Pachov wrote:
    Hi,

    On Sat, May 7, 2011 at 9:45 PM, Justin A. Lemkul <[email protected]
    <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:


        Please clarify - do you wish to maintain the original
        triclinic representation (as -ur tric does) or do you wish to
        see the octahedral representation (as -pbc mol -ur compact
        gives)?  My answer was based on your request to "keep the
        original unit shape."


    My original representation is truncated octahedron. Gromacs
    requires triclinic vectors and does not care about unit cell
    shape at the moment the md code starts. I wanted to keep MY
    original unit shape.



        For complicated systems (or sometimes even for simple ones),
        it is quite common that multiple iterations of trjconv are
        necessary.  A suggested workflow is indeed documented:

        
http://www.gromacs.org/Documentation/Terminology/Periodic_Boundary_Conditions#Suggested_trjconv_workflow

        The documentation must remain somewhat generic, as there are
        a number of specialty systems that can be considered.


    I thought the guidelines given by the trjconv specific manual
    were sufficient. I don't understand why people don't put this
    suggested workflow in the trjconv manual. It is confusing
    otherwise. It never came to me that one needed multiple usages of
    trjconv in order to achieve recentering around solute.

    Fair point. I've updated the trjconv documentation to provide this
    hint and a suggestiong to consult the webpage.


    I followed these instructions and got what I wanted. Basically,
    this was my quick workflow:

    =================================
    psfinname="$prot-$shape-$flc"
    topfile="$prot-$shape-$flc.top"
    grofile="$shape-$fl-eq.gro"
    inpfile="md.mdp"

    name="run1"
    newname="run1-recen"
    indexfile="index-all.ndx"
    tclfile="extr-frame-traj.tcl"

    s="Protein-Nucleo"
    indsolute=`cat $indexfile | awk -v site=$s
    '$1=="["{i++}$2==site{print i-1}'`
    cp $name.xtc $newname.xtc

    #===> 1
    intraj="$newname.xtc"
    outtraj="traj/$newname-whole.xtc"
    trjconv -f $intraj -s $name.tpr -n $indexfile -o $outtraj  -pbc
    whole > log1 2>&1 <<EOF1
    0
    EOF1
    #===> 2
    intraj="$outtraj"
    outtraj="traj/$newname-cluster.xtc"
    trjconv -f $intraj -s $name.tpr -n $indexfile -o $outtraj  -pbc
    cluster > log2 2>&1 <<EOF2
    $indsolute
    0
    EOF2
    #===> 3
    intraj="$outtraj"
    outtraj="traj/$newname-nojump.xtc"
    trjconv -f $intraj -n $indexfile -o $outtraj  -pbc nojump > log3
    2>&1 <<EOF3
    0
    EOF3
    #===> 4
    intraj="$outtraj"
    outtraj="traj/$newname-center.xtc"
    trjconv -f $intraj -n $indexfile -o $outtraj  -center > log4 2>&1
    <<EOF4
    $indsolute
    0
    EOF4
    #===> 5
    ## Get first frame from centered .xtc
    fr=1
    pdbfilename="`echo $outtraj | awk 'BEGIN{FS="."}{print $1}'`"
    pdbfile="$pdbfilename-${fr}ps.pdb"
    `which vmd` -dispdev text -e $tclfile -args $fr
    ${pathpsfin}/${psfinname}.psf $outtraj $pdbfilename > /dev/null

    cat $pdbfile | sed 's/TIP3/SOL /' | sed 's/ OH2 SOL/ OW  SOL/' |
    sed 's/ H1  SOL/ HW1 SOL/' | sed 's/ H2  SOL/ HW2 SOL/' | sed 's/
    SOD SOD/ NA  NA /g' | sed 's/ CLA CLA/ CL  CL /g' | sed 's/ HT1
    MET/ H1  MET/' | sed 's/ HT2 MET/ H2  MET/' | sed 's/ HT3 MET/ H3
     MET/' > $pdbfilename-${fr}ps-renamed.pdb

    grompp -f $inpfile -c $pdbfilename-${fr}ps-renamed.pdb -n
    $indexfile -p $topfile -o $newname-center.tpr > log5 2>&1
    #===> 6
    intraj="$outtraj"
    outtraj="traj/$newname-compact.xtc"
    trjconv -s $newname-center.tpr -f $intraj -n $indexfile -o
    $outtraj  -pbc mol -ur compact > log6 2>&1 <<EOF6
    0
    EOF6
    =================================


    However, it seems a long process, and if I have a large number of
    trajectories, it might not be feasible. I actually do not know if
    all steps are necessary. Particularly, I did step #5 just to get
    a new *tpr file from the centered trajectory ... Is there a way
    to do that in a simpler way within Gromacs?

    What steps are necessary depends what your purpose is. trjconv
    -dump should do step #5. What are you generating the centered
    trajectory for? What are you generating another .tpr for?


Since I am new to Gromacs, there are certain things I do not quite understand. I do step #5 only because I need a *tpr file corresponding to the centered trajectory, which I need for step #6, i.e. to finally make the trajectory compact. As far as I understood, I couldn't use the very original *tpr file for the last step #6, correct?

The final call to trjconv uses the .tpr only to learn the definitions of molecules, so I think the original one will do. That omits #5 altogether.

And I need the centered trajectory in order to move to my final goal, i.e. the compact the trajectory at step #6. Again, I thought that the "centering" step was necessary after the "nojump" trajectory had been obtained...

I dunno - try with and without if you want to simplify.

Also, can one use the trjconv -dump without a *tpr file? I do not think so.

The -s file (which sometimes doesn't need to be a .tpr file, see trjconv -h for list of file types for -s) is just used for atom names and such. So anything will do.

Which *tpr file should I use in order to get the first frame from the centered trajectory, and where (and how) should I get this file from (unless I can use the very original one)?

The coordinates in the .tpr file matter only if they're being used, and I think they're not being used in any of your steps.

Mark
-- 
gmx-users mailing list    [email protected]
http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search the archive at 
http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Search before posting!
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the 
www interface or send it to [email protected].
Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists

Reply via email to