On 15/07/2011 12:40 AM, Sheeba Jem wrote:

Hi, I had been trying different thermostats, barostats, time steps and coupling times to get remd for the peptide lipid system working and I had even equilibrated each replica for 50 ns before submitting them to remd. However none of them work when I use one processor per replica. That is, I have 50 replicas and when I submit the job with 50 processors the job crashes with the bad contacts error.

How soon? Under what REMD regime? The volume scaling required for NPT REMD can occasionally be problematic.

However when I use 4 processors per replica that is 200 processors instead of 50 then the job runs fine without any problem.

Probably that's just getting lucky with a starting configuration that's still got some kind of problem. Without seeing .mdp files, descriptions of simulation contents, preparation protocols and actual series of command lines, we can't tell what. If you can take the same .tpr files that sometimes cause problems with REMD, and successfully use them in non-REMD simulations on a range of differently-sized processor sets, then you might have evidence of a problem - but the REMD code is stable and well tested by now.

Mark

So I went back to the equilibrated systems described in my first mail and used the nose hoover thermostat, parinello-rahman semi-isotropic pressure coupling, coupled the protein, lipid, water and ions separately with no velocity generation and used 4 processors per replica and the simulation runs fine. I had ran a 20 ns remd run and it has completed successfully but for the exact same tpr files when I use 1 processor per replica I get the bad contacts error. Could the remd crashing have been due to some scaling issue? if so, the error in the log files with 'bad contacts' was misleading...

Sheeba





On Wed, Jul 6, 2011 at 1:06 AM, Mark Abraham <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:

    On 6/07/2011 2:49 PM, Sheeba Jem wrote:

    Hi Justin and Jianguo,

    Thank you for the suggestions. It makes sense to use the same
    velocities from the equilibration output instead of generating
    them and also to couple the groups separately. However they dont
    seem to work.

    I changed the gen_vel to 0 and used the cpt files and
    equilibration tpr files to generate the tpr files for the replica
    exchange runs but still got the bad contacts error.

    t = 2.010 ps: Water molecule starting at atom 21424 can not be
    settled.
    Check for bad contacts and/or reduce the timestep.
    Wrote pdb files with previous and current coordinates
    Jul  5 23:10:10 2011 32736 4 7.04 handleTSRegisterTerm(): TS
    reports task <5> pid <10337> on host<cmp-43-5> killed or core dumped


    I generated the tpr files with the following command:

    /ifs1/apps/gromacs-405/bin/grompp -f remd.mdp -c eq_1ns.tpr -o
    cptremd0.tpr -t eq_1ns.cpt -p popc_mlt.top


    I then coupled the components of the system separately and even
    that gave the same error.


    t = 2.018 ps: Water molecule starting at atom 7015 can not be
    settled.
    Check for bad contacts and/or reduce the timestep.
    Wrote pdb files with previous and current coordinates
    Jul  6 00:13:11 2011 7377 4 7.04 handleTSRegisterTerm(): TS
    reports task <1> pid <24584> on host<cmp-25-6> killed or core dumped

    I attach the mdp file that I used. I would appreciate any other
    suggestions you might have.

    The usual advice is here
    http://www.gromacs.org/Documentation/Terminology/Blowing_Up.

    Give up on REMD until you get basic equilibration working.

    Mark


    Thanks

    Sheeba









    On Tue, Jul 5, 2011 at 7:22 PM, Justin A. Lemkul <[email protected]
    <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:



        Sheeba Jem wrote:


            Dear Gromacs users,

             I am having trouble running REMD for a system containing
            one peptide molecule on the surface of a lipid membrane,
            the system contains the following:

            Protein   1
            POPC    128
            Water     4847
            Na+         9
            Cl-          15

            The total number of atoms in the system is 21483. I have
            50 replicas with temperatures distributed from 250 to 400
            K. After setting up the system I minimized and
             equilibrated the system for 14 ns at three temperatures:
            250 K, 300K and 350 K. I take the output file from the
            250 K run and use that as the starting structure for the
            temperatures between 250 to 300 K; similarly the output
            file from 300 K as the starting structure for replicas
            between 300 to 350 K and for the replicas between 350 to
            400 K I use the output from the 350 K run. I further
            equilibrate these structures at the replica temperature
            for 10 ns. The output from these 10 ns runs are then used
            as starting structures for the replica exchange
            simulation. However when the replica exchange simulation
            begins to run, it crashes after 2 ps with a bad contact
            error:


        Your equilibration protocol doesn't make much sense.  First,
        you're not equilibrating properly under all conditions, and
        then (in your .mdp file) you're re-generating velocities so
        you just end up destroying any equilibration you had
        previously achieved.  Membranes are particularly sensitive to
        proper equilibration, so I suspect this is your root problem.
         Equilibrate each system at the desired temperature,
        maintaining the ensemble by passing the appropriate .cpt file
        to grompp (with "gen_vel = no" so as not to override the
        existing velocities).



            t = 2.008 ps: Water molecule starting at atom 21421 can
            not be settled.
            Check for bad contacts and/or reduce the timestep.
            Wrote pdb files with previous and current coordinates
            Jul  4 18:07:21 2011 22666 4 7.04 handleTSRegisterTerm():
            TS reports task <7> pid <15856> on host<cmp-13-9> killed
            or core dumped


            I use the Gromacs version 4.0.5 for all the simulations.
            Since the starting structure for each replica has been
            well equilibrated I am not sure how there could be hard
            contacts in the system. I looked at the


        The configurations may be somewhat equilibrated, but you're
        killing that by generating velocities.


            input structures and the trajectories from the
            equilibration runs and I could not find anything strange
            with the system leading to hard contacts. Also the
            membrane remains intact for the high temperature
            replicas. Since I could not find anything to change in
            the system, I tried running REMD reducing the time step
            from 2 fs to 1 fs which also gave a similar error:


        If you get the same problem, it's likely still the
        thermostatting/velocity generation that's the problem.


            t = 2.020 ps: Water molecule starting at atom 18919 can
            not be settled.
            Check for bad contacts and/or reduce the timestep.
            Wrote pdb files with previous and current coordinates

            I then tried with a timestep of 0.1 fs and got the same
            bad contacts error:

            t = 0.101 ps: Water molecule starting at atom 20251 can
            not be settled.
            Check for bad contacts and/or reduce the timestep.
            Wrote pdb files with previous and current coordinates
            Jul  4 18:34:17 2011 25639 4 7.04 handleTSRegisterTerm():
            TS reports task <5> pid <17349> on host<cmp-4-5> killed
            or core dumped


            I am not sure if reducing the timestep further would help
            therefore I looked at the temperature and pressure
            coupling. For all the above simulations I had used
            nose-hoover thermostat and a  parrinello-rahman barostat
            with semi-isotropic pressure coupling. I had previously
            'successfully' ran a REMD simulation of the peptide in
            water with isotropic coupling, the difference in the two
            .mdp files were the type of pressure coupling and changes
            in the bond contraint parameters (I have attached both
            the mdp files). Since semi-isotropic pressure coupling
            reproduces membrane properties well, I had used it for
            the peptide-lipid system. To see if changing the coupling
            type made a difference, with the 0.1 fs time step, I
            changed the coupling type to isotropic and this time the
            job crashed with the lincs warning:


        Membranes are more sensitive, especially to temperature and
        pressure coupling and the state of equilibration.  Proteins
        in water are far more robust and take a lot of beating before
        they explode.  Therefore, the comparison is not a
        particularly good one.  Apples and oranges.

        -Justin

-- ========================================

        Justin A. Lemkul
        Ph.D. Candidate
        ICTAS Doctoral Scholar
        MILES-IGERT Trainee
        Department of Biochemistry
        Virginia Tech
        Blacksburg, VA
        jalemkul[at]vt.edu <http://vt.edu> | (540) 231-9080
        <tel:%28540%29%20231-9080>
        http://www.bevanlab.biochem.vt.edu/Pages/Personal/justin

        ========================================
-- gmx-users mailing list [email protected]
        <mailto:[email protected]>
        http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
        Please search the archive at
        http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Search before
        posting!
        Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the
        www interface or send it to [email protected]
        <mailto:[email protected]>.
        Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists




-- with regards,
    I. Sheeba Jem.


    --
    gmx-users mailing list [email protected]
    <mailto:[email protected]>
    http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
    Please search the archive at
    http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Search before posting!
    Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the
    www interface or send it to [email protected]
    <mailto:[email protected]>.
    Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists




--
with regards,
I. Sheeba Jem.

-- 
gmx-users mailing list    [email protected]
http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search the archive at 
http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Search before posting!
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the 
www interface or send it to [email protected].
Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists

Reply via email to