On 15/09/2011 5:13 AM, Juliette N. wrote:
Hello,
For the equilibration one usually looks at the total energy or the
observable of interest to be independent of time. I wanted to figure
out when we are referring to equilibration which of the run time or
n_steps parameters are important. One could run 1,000,000 steps with
dt of 0.001 ps or 0.002 ps
Your use of constraints is a critical factor in determining the largest
time step that will lead to simulation stability.
Mark
ending up with 1 and 2 ns simulation times. Can we infer that 2 ns
trial is closer to equilibration or one needs to look at the n_steps
regardless of total run time. I hope my question in clear to receive
your feedback.
Thanks,
--
gmx-users mailing list [email protected]
http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search the archive at
http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Search before posting!
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the
www interface or send it to [email protected].
Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists
