Gavin Melaugh wrote:
Hi Justin

Thanks very much. One last question. What do you mean when you say "COM
reference distance is changing signs"? I thought  the COM distance was
the absolute distance between the two groups and therefore cannot be
negative?


The pull code deals in vectors. Signs can change. The use of "distance" as a geometry is perhaps somewhat misleading.

-Justin

Cheers

Gavin

Dariush Mohammadyani wrote:
Hi Gavin,

A question arose for me: why did you consider the (rate = 0)?

Dariush
On Fri, Jan 6, 2012 at 11:47 AM, Gavin Melaugh <gmelaug...@qub.ac.uk
<mailto:gmelaug...@qub.ac.uk>> wrote:

    Hi Justin

    Just a quick clarification regarding my previous point. With
    geometry =
    distance, and pull_dim =Y Y Y . Is the pull_group sampling all
    dimensions equally (or without prejudice) about pull_init ?  And
    iN your
    first reply what did you mean about by "straight pull" ?

    Cheers

    Gavin

    Justin A. Lemkul wrote:
    >
    >
    > Gavin Melaugh wrote:
    >> Hi Justin
    >>
    >> Thanks for the reply. I wanted my "pulling" to be free in all
    >> directions, that is in the liquid state with no defined reaction
    >> coordinate i.e not along a specific axis. This is why I used
    geometry =
    >> distance. Would you agree with this approach?
    >
    > I suppose there is an argument that can be made for a more free
    > approach such as this one, but you're going to get the artifact you
    > observed the instant your pull group moves past a zero COM distance.
    > Whether or not this is a significant problem is something you'll
    have
    > to determine.
    >
    > -Justin
    >
    >> By free I mean. The absolute distance between the COG of the
    ref group
    >> and that of the pull group.
    >>
    >> Cheers
    >>
    >> Gavin
    >>
    >> Justin A. Lemkul wrote:
    >>>
    >>> Gavin Melaugh wrote:
    >>>> Dear all
    >>>>
    >>>> I have a query regarding umbrella sampling simulations that I
    have
    >>>> carried out to study a dynamical process of a guest inserting
    into a
    >>>> host. I always get get a wall tending off to infinity at or just
    >>>> before
    >>>> the zero distance between the
    >>>> two species.
    >>>> The process I describe, for one system in particular, happens
    readily
    >>>> and I have compared the PMF from a non constrained simulation
    (via the
    >>>> RDF and reversible work theorem) and the same PMF from a set of
    >>>> umbrella sampling
    >>>> simulations. They agree quite well but in the non constrained
    >>>> simulation
    >>>> I get a minimum practically at zero whereas for the umbrella
    sampling
    >>>> the minimum is shifted and there is an infinite wall close to
    zero.
    >>>> This
    >>>> wall is not present from the reversible work theorem. Why the
    infinite
    >>>> wall? Why does the black histogram not centre around zero. Is
    this an
    >>>> artefact of the umbrella technique? Please see attached the
    profile
    >>>> from
    >>>> the umbrella sampling technique, and the corresponding
    histograms.
    >>>>
    >>> What's happening is the COM reference distance is changing
    signs, so
    >>> you get an artifact.  The "distance" geometry is relatively
    inflexible
    >>> and is only suitable for straight pulls of continuously
    increasing or
    >>> continuously decreasing COM distance.  You should try using the
    >>> "position" geometry instead.  There are some notes that you
    may find
    >>> useful in my tutorial:
    >>>
    >>>
    
http://www.bevanlab.biochem.vt.edu/Pages/Personal/justin/gmx-tutorials/umbrella/05a_pull_tips.html
    >>>
    >>>
    >>>
    >>> -Justin
    >>>
    >>>> Here is an excerpt from one of the umbrella mdp files.
    >>>>
    >>>> pull        = umbrella
    >>>> pull_geometry = distance
    >>>> pull_dim = Y Y Y
    >>>> pull_start = no
    >>>> pull_ngroups = 1
    >>>> pull_group0 = cage_1
    >>>> pull_group1 = tail
    >>>> pull_init1 = 0
    >>>> pull_rate1 = 0.0
    >>>> pull_k1 = 10000
    >>>> pull_nstxout = 150
    >>>> pull_nstfout = 150
    >>>>
    >>>>
    >>>> Cheers
    >>>>
    >>>> Gavin
    >>>>
    >>>>
    >>>>
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
    >>>>
    >>>>
    >>>>
    >>>>
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
    >>>>
    >>>>
    >>
    >>
    >

    --
    gmx-users mailing list    gmx-users@gromacs.org
    <mailto:gmx-users@gromacs.org>
    http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
    Please search the archive at
    http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Search before posting!
    Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the
    www interface or send it to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org
    <mailto:gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org>.
    Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists




--
Kind Regards,
Dariush Mohammadyani
Department of Structural Biology
University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine
Biomedical Science Tower 3
3501 Fifth Avenue
Pittsburgh, PA 15261
USA



--
========================================

Justin A. Lemkul
Ph.D. Candidate
ICTAS Doctoral Scholar
MILES-IGERT Trainee
Department of Biochemistry
Virginia Tech
Blacksburg, VA
jalemkul[at]vt.edu | (540) 231-9080
http://www.bevanlab.biochem.vt.edu/Pages/Personal/justin

========================================
--
gmx-users mailing list    gmx-users@gromacs.org
http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search the archive at 
http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Search before posting!
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the www interface or send it to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.
Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists

Reply via email to