On 24/01/2012 3:29 PM, Rodrigo Faccioli wrote:
Hi Gianluca,

I forgot to say that the step of compute the energies is considered from pdb2gmx until g_energy.

If your topology is not changing, then you need only construct a new pseudo-trajectory for the n configurations whose energy you want, and then run mdrun -rerun using the same .tpr every time. Even if the topology can change, for doing lots of iterates, some kind of hash will allow you to reuse previously generated .tpr files very cheaply.

Mark


Sorry about my oblivion.

Best regards,

--
Rodrigo Antonio Faccioli
Ph.D Student in Electrical Engineering
University of Sao Paulo - USP
Engineering School of Sao Carlos - EESC
Department of Electrical Engineering - SEL
Intelligent System in Structure Bioinformatics
http://laips.sel.eesc.usp.br
Phone: 55 (16) 3373-9366 Ext 229
Curriculum Lattes - http://lattes.cnpq.br/1025157978990218
Public Profile - http://br.linkedin.com/pub/rodrigo-faccioli/7/589/a5


On Tue, Jan 24, 2012 at 1:07 AM, Rodrigo Faccioli <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:

    Hi Gianluca,

    Thanks your question.

    All steps to obtain a generation with 200 individuals, on average,
is 6 minutes for 1VII, example. In each generation I must converted my proteins Dihedral to Cartesian representation,
    compute the energies, choose the individuals which will go to
    reproduction, save previous population. This test was using one
    core of a conventional Desktop computer.

    The proteins, that I have tested my algorithm, vary from 20 to 56
    amino acids.

    Best regards,

    --
    Rodrigo Antonio Faccioli
    Ph.D Student in Electrical Engineering
    University of Sao Paulo - USP
    Engineering School of Sao Carlos - EESC
    Department of Electrical Engineering - SEL
    Intelligent System in Structure Bioinformatics
    http://laips.sel.eesc.usp.br
    Phone: 55 (16) 3373-9366 Ext 229
    Curriculum Lattes - http://lattes.cnpq.br/1025157978990218
    Public Profile - http://br.linkedin.com/pub/rodrigo-faccioli/7/589/a5


    On Tue, Jan 24, 2012 at 12:36 AM, Gianluca Interlandi
    <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:

        Thanks Enrico!

        Just wondering. How fast is it? Calling gromacs must have a
        lot of overhead. Also, do you call mdrun or does g_energy
        evaluate the energy?

        Gianluca


        On Tue, 24 Jan 2012, Rodrigo Faccioli wrote:

            Hi,

            Although I don't work with MC simulation, I have used
            Gromacs to obtain energies and others
            protein features in my Evolutionary Algorithms (EA).

            In general lines, I created a script that calls Gromacs
            programs and the output of these
            programs, such as g_energy (I read its xvg file), I stored
            it at a specific file which is
            read by my algorithm and its values are put into my data
            structure. I call Gromacs either
            implicit or explicit solvent.

            My project is working with EA until now. However, the
            integration with GROMACS is able to
            work with other kind of algorithms such as MC. Actually,
            we have idea to work with MC. But,
            I don't know when it will be possible. If you want, we can
            talk about join these work.

            Best regards,

            --
            Rodrigo Antonio Faccioli
            Ph.D Student in Electrical Engineering
            University of Sao Paulo - USP
            Engineering School of Sao Carlos - EESC
            Department of Electrical Engineering - SEL
            Intelligent System in Structure Bioinformatics
            http://laips.sel.eesc.usp.br
            Phone: 55 (16) 3373-9366 Ext 229
            Curriculum Lattes - http://lattes.cnpq.br/1025157978990218
            Public Profile -
            http://br.linkedin.com/pub/rodrigo-faccioli/7/589/a5


            On Mon, Jan 23, 2012 at 11:39 PM, Gianluca Interlandi
            <[email protected]
            <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
                 Hi!

                 I would like to use gromacs to perform Monte Carlo
            simulations in implicit
                 solvent of a protein near a surface. The protein is
            treated as a rigid body
                 whereas the surface is fix.

                 I see that there are plans to code MC into gromacs:

            http://www.gromacs.org/Developer_Zone/Programming_Guide/Monte_Carlo

                 Is there a preliminary version?

                 If not, I wonder whether anybody has tried to do MC
            with gromacs using IMD and
                 MDDriver:

            http://www.baaden.ibpc.fr/projects/mddriver/

                 Besides this. Is there an easy way to obtain the
            force field energy of a system
                 using gromacs? Would I have to run a 0-steps MD and
            read out the energy? I know
                 that this would have a big overhead in a MC
            simulation, but it might be worth
                 trying.

                 Thanks,

                     Gianluca

                 -----------------------------------------------------
                 Gianluca Interlandi, PhD [email protected]
            <mailto:[email protected]>
            +1 (206) 685 4435 <tel:%2B1%20%28206%29%20685%204435>
            http://artemide.bioeng.washington.edu/

                 Postdoc at the Department of Bioengineering
                 at the University of Washington, Seattle WA U.S.A.
                 -----------------------------------------------------
                 --
                 gmx-users mailing list [email protected]
            <mailto:[email protected]>
            http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
                 Please search the archive at
            http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Search before
            posting!
                 Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list.
            Use the www interface or
                 send it to [email protected]
            <mailto:[email protected]>.
                 Can't post? Read
            http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists





        -----------------------------------------------------
        Gianluca Interlandi, PhD [email protected]
        <mailto:[email protected]>
        +1 (206) 685 4435 <tel:%2B1%20%28206%29%20685%204435>
        http://artemide.bioeng.washington.edu/

        Postdoc at the Department of Bioengineering
        at the University of Washington, Seattle WA U.S.A.
        -----------------------------------------------------

        --
        gmx-users mailing list [email protected]
        <mailto:[email protected]>
        http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
        Please search the archive at
        http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Search before
        posting!
        Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the
        www interface or send it to [email protected]
        <mailto:[email protected]>.
        Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists






-- 
gmx-users mailing list    [email protected]
http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search the archive at 
http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Search before posting!
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the 
www interface or send it to [email protected].
Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists

Reply via email to