Steven Neumann wrote:


On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 1:46 PM, Justin A. Lemkul <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:



    Steven Neumann wrote:



        On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 12:16 PM, Mark Abraham
        <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
        <mailto:[email protected].__au
        <mailto:[email protected]>>> wrote:

           On 30/01/2012 8:43 PM, Steven Neumann wrote:

               Dear Gmx Users,
                    I run the simulation of protein with 10 ligands (200
            ns). In total
               I should have total of 4000 frames as I set up:

               nsteps = 100000000

               dt = 0.002

               nstxout = 25000


           ... iff the simulation completed successfully.


               I used trjconv -f md.trr -o mdnojump.xtc -pbc nojump

               The trajectory which I read in VMD has 3008 frames and my
            ligands
               completely disappear after 8 frame (They are not in PBC
            windows
               which I checked in Graphics -> Graphical Representation
            -> Periodic)


           Your choice of trjconv workflow demands that the protein be
        allowed
           to diffuse away. What VMD makes of that is not really of
        consequence
           to discuss here. Perhaps you can design a better trjconv
        workflow,
           as here
http://www.gromacs.org/__Documentation/Terminology/__Periodic_Boundary_Conditions
        
<http://www.gromacs.org/Documentation/Terminology/Periodic_Boundary_Conditions>


         Thank you. I managed to fix it using:
         trjconv -f md.trr -o md1000.xtc -skip 4  (1000 frames instead
        of 4000)
         Then accoring to the workflow (PBC) I used:
trjconv -f md1000.xtc -s md.tpr -pbc mol -o mdmol.xtc
         trjconv -f mdmol.xtc -s md.tpr -center -o mdCENTER.xtc  (Center
        on a protein, output - System)
trjconv -f mdCENTER.xtc -s md.tpr -fit rot+trans -o mdFit.xtc
        (Protein, output - System)

However, all ligands jump rapidly

         around the protein till the time they bind to the protein
        surface (and the begining they were randomly placed around the
        protein) one by one. At the end when all of them stacked on my
        protein everything is ok. Will you suggest something?


    Is this unusual?  It sounds like the molecules diffuse around until
    they bind to the protein.  You're centering on the protein and then
    fitting its translation and rotation; everything else will be
    processed relative to those criteria.

    -Justin

Sorry, I did not clarify it properly. What is unusual is that
my ligands (until they bind) jump to its periodic images. It is a speed light diffusion :) Any suggestions?

Nope. As I said, you fitted everything on the protein (which is sensible). Everything else is manipulated accordingly. Perhaps it's a bit inconvenient to watch, but there's no real way to avoid periodic jumps of every molecule simultaneously, you need a reference position, which for you is the protein.

-Justin

--
========================================

Justin A. Lemkul
Ph.D. Candidate
ICTAS Doctoral Scholar
MILES-IGERT Trainee
Department of Biochemistry
Virginia Tech
Blacksburg, VA
jalemkul[at]vt.edu | (540) 231-9080
http://www.bevanlab.biochem.vt.edu/Pages/Personal/justin

========================================
--
gmx-users mailing list    [email protected]
http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search the archive at 
http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Search before posting!
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the www interface or send it to [email protected].
Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists

Reply via email to