James Starlight wrote:
Justin,

I've built my system in accordance to the first way from your Biphgastic system tutorial.

I've defined system with slight biger ( on 1 nm in each dimension) dimensions that I needed and place maximym CCl4 molecules in that box by

genbox -ci ccl4.gro -nmol 900 -box  9.6 7.5 4 -o new_box.gro

So I've supposed that I've defined maximum density for such box. How else I could specify starting density of my box?


Some simple calculations using the desired density and the box dimensions (to get the volume) will tell you exactly how many molecules you need. If you only "suppose" you've got a reasonable number, there are better ways to be sure ;)

2) I've tried use 1.4 VDV cutoff and crash of my system happened almost alfter first 0.5 ns of simulation. By the way in the KALP tutorial I've found Cutoff = 1.2. Why in that case you've used such uncommon values ?


We have demonstrated that this value is acceptable for such systems. The lipid force field model was derived using 1.0 nm cutoffs, and Gromos96 with a 0.8/1.4 nm twin-range scheme. When combining these particular force fields (which can be done in this case), we had to find a set of values that would reproduce the behavior of each parameter set. The value of 1.2 nm sufficiently reproduced the behavior of both, when combined. Without such justification, one should not alter cutoffs.

-Justin

--
========================================

Justin A. Lemkul
Ph.D. Candidate
ICTAS Doctoral Scholar
MILES-IGERT Trainee
Department of Biochemistry
Virginia Tech
Blacksburg, VA
jalemkul[at]vt.edu | (540) 231-9080
http://www.bevanlab.biochem.vt.edu/Pages/Personal/justin

========================================
--
gmx-users mailing list    gmx-users@gromacs.org
http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search the archive at 
http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Search before posting!
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the www interface or send it to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.
Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists

Reply via email to