Dear All,
I went through and did some initial things with WHAM, and found the following.
if I use pullf the calculated free energy change, and change over time makes a
nice perfect hemi parabolic graph that fits all the data in our and other labs.
if I use the pullx I get a graph of a zero line up unto a point halfway through
the trajectories (and distance moved), which then starts at a peak equal to the
correct free energy change of the entire run from the pullf, but then goes down
to zero rapidlly over the rest of the run (ie the graph has a reversed shape,
and peaks mid trajectory instead of at the end?). If I just use the total free
energy change, they match?
Could somone explain to me why so I dont have to scramble through too much code
(the math used) to figure it out...
Grüess,
Stephan Watkins
--
NEU: FreePhone 3-fach-Flat mit kostenlosem Smartphone!
Jetzt informieren: http://mobile.1und1.de/?ac=OM.PW.PW003K20328T7073a
--
gmx-users mailing list [email protected]
http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search the archive at
http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Search before posting!
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the
www interface or send it to [email protected].
Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists
