Additionally, you need to be careful with the PBC when using g_gyrate, as if 
part of the micelle is split across it, then the radius provided will be wrong.

If you have 3 micelles, then you will have to generate an index file with a 
group for the molecules/atoms within each of the micelles, then pass each group 
to g_gyrate separately to get the radius for each micelle.

>From what you have written you have calculated the radius of gyration of all 
>of the surfactant molecules within your simulation, which is more than likely 
>not what you want.

Catch ya,

Dr. Dallas Warren
Medicinal Chemistry and Drug Action
Monash Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Monash University
381 Royal Parade, Parkville VIC 3010
[email protected]
+61 3 9903 9304
---------------------------------
When the only tool you own is a hammer, every problem begins to resemble a nail.

From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On 
Behalf Of Mark Abraham
Sent: Wednesday, 11 April 2012 5:05 PM
To: Discussion list for GROMACS users
Subject: Re: [gmx-users] regarding micelle and its analysis

On 11/04/2012 3:48 PM, priya thiyagarajan wrote:
hello sir,

i am studying about micelle formation of surfactants. i performed my run for 
10ns.. when i visualize my final md pdb file i got around 2 to 3 micelles.

my doubt is while performing analysis , g_gyrate giving a value of around 3nm..

this value corresponds to which micelle..

None of them. It corresponds to the group you told g_gyrate to analyse. See 
g_gyrate -h. Since you haven't told us which group you told g_gyrate to use, 
you've forced me to guess that you told it to work on all your surfactant 
molecules. If you'd given a full description of what you'd done, then you'd be 
more likely to have people wanting and able to help you, and thus be more 
likely to get useful help. Anyway, g_gyrate can't guess that you want it to 
look at some magic subsets of the whole system. You have to define the subsets, 
e.g. with g_select, and only then can g_gyrate compute properties on them.

Mark



how its calculating this value..

please help me with your answer..

i am so confused with my analysis..

thanking you,



-- 
gmx-users mailing list    [email protected]
http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search the archive at 
http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Search before posting!
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the 
www interface or send it to [email protected].
Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists

Reply via email to