On 6/12/12 4:13 AM, Satish Kamath wrote:
I've refined the charge distribution.
    nr      type  resnr resid  atom  cgnr   charge-  prodrg (NEW)       mass
      1        OA     1  F09     OAD     1   -0.117 (-0.596)            15.9994
      2         H     1  F09     HAD     1    0.027 (+0.469)            1.0080
      3         C     1  F09     CAC     1    0.078 (+0.274)            12.0110
      4       CR1     1  F09     CAF     1   -0.005 (-0.390)            12.0110
      5        HC     1  F09     HAF     1    0.014 (+0.195)            1.0080
      6         C     1  F09     CAH     1   -0.014 (+0.104)            12.0110
      7       CR1     1  F09     CAI     1   -0.006 (-0.197)            12.0110
      8        HC     1  F09     HAI     1    0.014 (+0.140)            1.0080
      9       CR1     1  F09     CAK     1   -0.005 (-0.139)            12.0110
     10        HC     1  F09     HAK     1    0.014 (+0.139)            1.0080
     11       CR1     1  F09     CAL     2   -0.006 (-0.139)            12.0110
     12        HC     1  F09     HAL     2    0.014 (+0.139)            1.0080
     13       CR1     1  F09     CAJ     2   -0.005 (-0.197)            12.0110
     14        HC     1  F09     HAJ     2    0.014 (+0.140)            1.0080
     15         C     1  F09     CAG     2   -0.014 (+0.104)            12.0110
     16       CR1     1  F09     CAA     2   -0.005 (-0.390)            12.0110
     17        HC     1  F09     HAA     2    0.013 (+0.195)            1.0080
     18         C     1  F09     CAB     2    0.078 (+0.274)            12.0110
     19        OA     1  F09     OAE     2   -0.116 (-0.594)            15.9994
     20         H     1  F09     HAE     2    0.027 (+0.469)            1.0080
The ones in the bracket are the new charges applied. These are from the
Automated Topology Builder which does the QM calculations. They seemed more
appropriate as they match with the ones on p-cresol in the paper. I did not
modify the bond parameters from PRODRG as suggested by the paper. The
potential energy has reduced and is arnd 1.5e+04 but is still positive. Can
I get some help with this? Thank you for all the help in advance. :)


Those charges certainly do look better. How long are your simulations? It may take quite a while for your system to rearrange and equilibrate appropriately.

-Justin

--
========================================

Justin A. Lemkul, Ph.D.
Research Scientist
Department of Biochemistry
Virginia Tech
Blacksburg, VA
jalemkul[at]vt.edu | (540) 231-9080
http://www.bevanlab.biochem.vt.edu/Pages/Personal/justin

========================================


--
gmx-users mailing list    [email protected]
http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search the archive at 
http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Search before posting!
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the www interface or send it to [email protected].
Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists

Reply via email to