Thanks. Yes, you told me this before CHARMM36 is better than CHARMM27. But I'm afraid of using C36. Because I think it's a newer FF and and less studies have done by it. Then if I face a problem, I can't find a way through articles!
Don't you think so? Sincerely, Shima ----- Original Message ----- From: Justin A. Lemkul <[email protected]> To: Shima Arasteh <[email protected]>; Discussion list for GROMACS users <[email protected]> Cc: Sent: Friday, June 29, 2012 4:46 AM Subject: Re: [gmx-users] Berger lipid On 6/28/12 8:15 PM, Shima Arasteh wrote: > Hi all, > > I want to simulate a protein in POPC bilayer by CHARMM27 FF. I know > phospholipids and protein are defined well in CHARMM27. Is Berger lipid > required ? > No, these are different force fields entirely. The CHARMM36 parameter set is better for lipids than CHARMM27. -Justin -- ======================================== Justin A. Lemkul, Ph.D. Research Scientist Department of Biochemistry Virginia Tech Blacksburg, VA jalemkul[at]vt.edu | (540) 231-9080 http://www.bevanlab.biochem.vt.edu/Pages/Personal/justin ======================================== -- gmx-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users * Only plain text messages are allowed! * Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Search before posting! * Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the www interface or send it to [email protected]. * Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists
