On 5/23/13 11:27 AM, Bao Kai wrote:
Hi,

Thank you for your prompt reply.

I just think since we have added so many constraints on the shape of
the molecules, the molecules should keep their shapes.

I am wrong?  I have not done simulation with such big molecules
before.  I just did some simulations with water and CO2. The case can
be different, right?


Your topology does not indicate any sort of shape constraints, nor should you be using any.

-Justin

Thanks,
Kai

On 5/23/13 11:16 AM, Bao Kai wrote:
Hi, all,

I finally wrote a decane topology file. I used it to some simple simulation.

The energy minimization works, while after a simple nvt equilibration,
the shape of the molecules changed.

Please find the images before and after the nvt equilibration from the
following links.
https://www.dropbox.com/s/qcfgipchnus3vcb/before_nvt.png
https://www.dropbox.com/s/nvbxbs6tofdc0ol/after_nvt.png


I see nothing wrong.  The outcome seems totally normal for an MD
simulation.  If
molecules didn't change their configuration, what would be the point of
simulating? ;)

-Justin



The following is the topology part for the decane molecule.   Please
help to check if there is anything wrong.   C2 and C3 are CH2 and CH3
respectively.

[ defaults ]
; nbfunc    comb-rule   gen-pairs   fudgeLJ fudgeQQ
      1          3          yes         0.5    0.5

[ atomtypes ]
;   type  at.num    mass    charge    ptype    sigma        epsilon
        C2   6     14.0270    0.0      A        0.374        0.4301
        C3   6     15.035      0.0      A        0.374        0.6243
[ moleculetype ]
; Name            nrexcl
D10                 3

[ atoms ]
;   nr       type  resnr residue  atom   cgnr     charge       mass
typeB    chargeB      massB
       1        C3      1    D10     1C3      1       0.0         15.035
   ; qtot -0.18
       2        C2      1    D10     1C2      2      0.0          14.027
    ; qtot -0.3
       3        C2      1    D10     2C2      3      0.0          14.027
    ; qtot -0.42
       4        C2      1    D10     3C2      4      0.0          14.027
    ; qtot -0.54
       5        C2      1    D10     4C2      5      0.0          14.027
    ; qtot -0.66
       6        C2      1    D10     5C2      6      0.0          14.027
    ; qtot -0.78
       7        C2      1    D10     6C2      7      0.0          14.027
    ; qtot -0.9
       8        C2      1    D10     7C2      8      0.0          14.027
    ; qtot -1.02
       9        C2      1    D10     8C2      9      0.0          14.027
    ; qtot -1.14
      10        C3      1    D10     2C3      10     0.0          15.035
    ; qtot -1.32


[ bonds ]
;  ai    aj funct            c0            c1            c2            c3
      1     2     1  1.530000e-01  5430000  1.530000e-01  5430000
      2     3     1  1.530000e-01  5430000  1.530000e-01  5430000
      3     4     1  1.530000e-01  5430000  1.530000e-01  5430000
      4     5     1  1.530000e-01  5430000  1.530000e-01  5430000
      5     6     1  1.530000e-01  5430000  1.530000e-01  5430000
      6     7     1  1.530000e-01  5430000  1.530000e-01  5430000
      7     8     1  1.530000e-01  5430000  1.530000e-01  5430000
      8     9     1  1.530000e-01  5430000  1.530000e-01  5430000
      9    10     1  1.530000e-01  5430000  1.530000e-01  5430000

[ pairs ]
;  ai    aj funct            c0            c1            c2            c3
      1     4     1
      2     5     1
      3     6     1
      4     7     1
      5     8     1
      6     9     1
      7    10     1

[ angles ]
;  ai    aj    ak funct            c0            c1            c2            c3
      1     2     3     2  1.110000e+02  4.000000e+02  1.110000e+02  
4.000000e+02
      2     3     4     2  1.110000e+02  4.000000e+02  1.110000e+02  
4.000000e+02
      3     4     5     2  1.110000e+02  4.000000e+02  1.110000e+02  
4.000000e+02
      4     5     6     2  1.110000e+02  4.000000e+02  1.110000e+02  
4.000000e+02
      5     6     7     2  1.110000e+02  4.000000e+02  1.110000e+02  
4.000000e+02
      6     7     8     2  1.110000e+02  4.000000e+02  1.110000e+02  
4.000000e+02
      7     8     9     2  1.110000e+02  4.000000e+02  1.110000e+02  
4.000000e+02
      8     9    10     2  1.110000e+02  4.000000e+02  1.110000e+02  
4.000000e+02

[ dihedrals ]
;  ai    aj    ak    al funct            c0            c1
c2            c3            c4            c5
      1     2     3     4     3  0.000000e+00 5.000000e+00  3.000000e+00
   0.000000e+00 5.000000e+00  3.000000e+00
      2     3     4     5     3  0.000000e+00 5.000000e+00  3.000000e+00
   0.000000e+00 5.000000e+00  3.000000e+00
      3     4     5     6     3  0.000000e+00 5.000000e+00  3.000000e+00
   0.000000e+00 5.000000e+00  3.000000e+00
      4     5     6     7     3  0.000000e+00 5.000000e+00  3.000000e+00
   0.000000e+00 5.000000e+00  3.000000e+00
      5     6     7     8     3  0.000000e+00 5.000000e+00  3.000000e+00
   0.000000e+00 5.000000e+00  3.000000e+00
      6     7     8     9     3  0.000000e+00 5.000000e+00  3.000000e+00
   0.000000e+00 5.000000e+00  3.000000e+00
      7     8     9    10     3  0.000000e+00 5.000000e+00  3.000000e+00
   0.000000e+00 5.000000e+00  3.000000e+00


[system]
sparkling water
[molecules]
D10 208

Thank you very much.

Best Regards,
Kai



--
========================================

Justin A. Lemkul, Ph.D.
Research Scientist
Department of Biochemistry
Virginia Tech
Blacksburg, VA
jalemkul[at]vt.edu | (540) 231-9080
http://www.bevanlab.biochem.vt.edu/Pages/Personal/justin

========================================
--
gmx-users mailing list    [email protected]
http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
* Please search the archive at 
http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Search before posting!
* Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the www interface or send it to [email protected].
* Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists

Reply via email to