On Wednesday 23 August 2006 16:08, Vitaly Alexeev wrote:
> - for (iterator it = _characters.begin(),
> - itEnd = _characters.end();
> + //Vitaly: That there was no crash gnash we iterate through
> the copy + std::list<DisplayItem> tmp_list = _characters; //vv
> +
> + for (iterator it = tmp_list.begin(), itEnd = tmp_list.end();
> it != itEnd; ++it)
What about:
for (iterator it = _characters.begin(); it != _characters.end(); ++it) {
// ..
}
?
This would save you a copy and (I believe) would be safer than the
original.
Bastiaan
_______________________________________________
Gnash-commit mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnash-commit
