On Sun, Dec 03, 2006 at 03:27:36PM +0100, Udo Giacomozzi wrote: > Hello Sandro, > > Friday, December 1, 2006, 4:52:17 PM, you wrote: > SS> + /// TODO: Take a Range2d<T> rather then a gnash::rect ? > SS> + /// Would T==int be good ? TWIPS as integer types ? > > It would be enough but as far as I remember we discussed that it's > probably better to use floats to avoid lots of conversions between > float and int.
Yes, I remember something like that too. It was with Martin intervention, based on matrix computations. So, trying to define the "coordinate space" of the core library, would that be float values for TWIPS ? And, what would the legal range be (the legal float range, it seems, right ? including negative values ...) ? --strk; _______________________________________________ Gnash-commit mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnash-commit
