On Wed, Mar 07, 2007 at 10:52:02AM +0100, ann wrote: > On Tue, 6 Mar 2007, Rob Savoye wrote: > > >strk wrote: > >>On Tue, Mar 06, 2007 at 08:46:12AM +0100, ann wrote: > > > >>Ehm... can we avoid complete examples ? > > > > Most people are too lazy to read the code for examples, so putting > >them in the manual seemed a good idea at the time. I guess maintaining > >them is a pain in the neck, but in this case, hopefully how objects get > >instantiated in the VM will stop changing. :-) I do think that if > >examples are in manuals, they should be real code, and kept up to date. > > I think that it is worth having one class which can be considered a sort > of flagship. This would contain the most current interface and the cleanest > code.
I'd say the cleanest and simpest would be Boolean.cpp, except from the static casts, to be changed into calls to ensureBoolean(). --strk; _______________________________________________ Gnash-commit mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnash-commit
