On Tue, May 22, 2007 at 04:32:56PM +0800, zou lunkai wrote:
> On 5/22/07, zou lunkai <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >+       /// A set of depth for each frame
> >+       //
> >+       /// Access to this container is mutex-protected
> >+       /// for thread safety. See _frameDepthsMutex.
> >+       ///
> >+       FrameDepths _frameDepths;
> >
> >I think the set of depths for a frame would tell us: characters in
> >these depths should be kept alive when jump backward and forward. And
> >the set of depths might be *changed* by tags(eg. REPLACE and PLACE
> >with ratio bigger than zero) in later frames.
> >
> >In other words: this set will not only dependent on tags before the
> >target frame, but also tags *after* the target frame. right?
> >
> Ah, if it is dependent on tags after the target frame(isn't it?) ,
> then it means we could hardly get the correct behaviour before a
> completely loading of the movie when jumping back.

Right. Good reason for not being dependent. See precedent mail
for an alternative handling.

--strk;


_______________________________________________
Gnash-commit mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnash-commit

Reply via email to