>I'm not quite clear why someone would do it this way, though...
At least Ming does not support setting both flags to false.
Em.., Current timeline control haven't considered this sitiuation, but
shouldn't be difficult to fix. Good to know.
On 8/24/07, Chad Musick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Yes, in the situation listed PlaceObject2/3 acts as a RemoveObject2 tag.
> There's no difference in functionality between the two. I'm not quite
> clear why someone would do it this way, though...
>
> On Fri, 2007-08-24 at 14:01 +0800, zou lunkai wrote:
> > + else if (has_char == false && flag_move == false)
> > + {
> > + m_place_type = REMOVE;
> > + }
> >
> > PlaceObject2/3 could act as a REMOVE tag? Sounds interesting, never
> > met this situation before. Any difference compared to RemoveObject
> > tag?
>
>
>
_______________________________________________
Gnash-commit mailing list
Gnash-commit@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnash-commit
