the test itself is bogus, fixed. thanks. On 9/6/07, Sandro Santilli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thu, Sep 06, 2007 at 10:21:18AM +0800, zou lunkai wrote: > > > This test is reported as an evidence of behaviour 2 in > > > ActionsExecutionOrder#Verified_behaviour wiki page, so we either > > > need another or that behaviour is not verified !! > > > > Again, this has already been tested. I updated the wiki page. See > > misc-swfc.all/action_execution_order_test10.sc > > I've seen that testcase. It contains (listswf-verified): > > DOACTION (6) > REMOVEOBJECT (7) > DOACTION (9) > REMOVEOBJECT (8) > > The order obtained is 6,7,8,9 while behaviour 2 suggest we should get 6,7,9,8: > > "(2)If RemoveObject is after DoAction, then OnUnload is also called > after executing actionscripts in DoAction. Otherwise before DoAction" > > RemoveObject (7) is after DoAction (6) and called after DoAction (6). > RemoveObject (8) is after DoAction (9) but called before ! > > --strk; >
_______________________________________________ Gnash-commit mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnash-commit
