On Wed, Sep 27, 2006 at 02:46:22PM +0200, Udo Giacomozzi wrote: > Instead, I suggest implementing methods like display_shape(), > display_bitmap() and so on (is there much left?) in the renderer. > These methods expect the instance and the definition as arguments and > do the actual drawing. At least display_shape() could be implemented > in the base class and use the current tesselator. One can overwrite it > in the correct renderer class to use other tesselators.
Agree, let's pass some render-agnostic data to the renderers, not important to pass instances atm, just whatever is appropriate, but NOT requiring calls to the renderer during parsing. > The renderer can store any cache object he likes in the definition (or > maybe also in the instance, if that makes sense) since it has access > to it. Yes, let's proceed in this direction. --strk; _______________________________________________ Gnash-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnash-dev
